Monthly Archives: June 2006

Superman or Clark?

In his review of Superman Retrurns, Stephen writes:

One professional reviewer wondered why Superman bothers with the Clark Kent persona. It’s true that because this movie was emphasizing Superman, Clark’s role is rather light in this film. But I think Superman Returns explains the need for Clark Kent better than ever before. Hero work, particularly if you are very different from others, is lonely. Sometimes you just want to be a normal guy. Sometimes you want the weight of the world – note the Atlas images in this film – lifted.

Superman_296.jpg

I grew up reading what is now called the “silver age” Superman comics. Superman was the real guy and Clark Kent was the disguise. Originally, and today — especially with a show like Smallville out there — it’s understood that Clark is the real guy and Superman is a persona he assumes when he wants to act in a way that’s in keeping with his unique alien heritage. Yes, he has owned the fact that he’s the son of Jor-El and the Last Son of Krypton; but deep down, he sees himself as a guy who grew up on a farm in Kansas.

As an adult, Clark has had to affect mannerisms — clumsiness, cowardice, etc. — that aren’t really him. He does this to protect his true identity from being discovered. There’s no need to protect Superman. He’s protecting his true self — Clark Kent.

Anyhow, that’s how I see it. But the debate goes on. Here’s an opposing view, found in a speech from the movie Kill Bill:

An essential characteristic of the superhero mythology is, there’s the superhero, and there’s the alter ego. Batman is actually Bruce Wayne, Spider-Man is actually Peter Parker. When he wakes up in the morning, he’s Peter Parker. He has to put on a costume to become Spider-Man. And it is in that characteristic that Superman stands alone. Superman did not become Superman, Superman was born Superman. When Superman wakes up in the morning, he’s Superman. His alter ego is Clark Kent. His outfit with the big red “S”, that’s the blanket he was wrapped in as a baby when the Kents found him. Those are his clothes. What Kent wears, the glasses, the business suit, that’s the costume. That’s the costume Superman wears to blend in with us. Clark Kent is how Superman views us. And what are the characteristics of Clark Kent? He’s weak, he’s unsure of himself… he’s a coward. Clark Kent is Superman’s critique on the whole human race

Leave it to a sociopath like Bill to get it exactly wrong. Clark conceals great strength and courage with a mild-mannered exterior. He’s kind. He’s honest. He’s decent. If he thought about it in those terms at all, Superman would tell you that Clark Kent is his homage to humanity.

Superman Returns earns an A

I took my wife and four sons to see Superman Returns last night. It is definitely worth the 8 – $10 ticket price.

The first question many people will have is whether this movie is a sequel to the Christopher Reeve movies. Well, yes and no. First, forget Superman 3 and 4 (no problem for me, I had already). If this film is a sequel at all, it follows Superman 2.

But it’s more of a impressionistic than literal sequel. The director obviously paid homage to those first two Superman movies but didn’t feel constrained by them. He took what worked from those films and then moved forward. I think it was a good choice.

To me, the most significant change was Lex Luthor. Gene Hackman played Luthor as a sort of super-smart buffoon. This Luthor is darker, but more understandable. He sees himself as Prometheus – stealing the fire of alien technology from a selfish god for the benefit of mortals. If that theft requires the death of a few billion people, well the ends justify the means. And yes, it’s Superman that Lex sees as a selfish god.

These Religious themes, particularly the references to Christ, are impossible to miss. When Lois Lane’s tells Superman that the world doesn’t need a savior, he flies Lois above Metropolis. Floating above the city he says that he hears everything below and “the world is crying out for a savior.”

One professional reviewer wondered why Superman bothers with the Clark Kent persona. It’s true that because this movie was emphasizing Superman, Clark’s role is rather light in this film. But I think Superman Returns explains the need for Clark Kent better than ever before. Hero work, particularly if you are very different from others, is lonely. Sometimes you just want to be a normal guy. Sometimes you want the weight of the world – note the Atlas images in this film – lifted.

I had a friend ask whether this Superman movie was “gay.” Apparently this movie has been embraced by the homosexual community. After seeing the film, I’m not sure why. Maybe gays like this particular actor in the Superman tights – or maybe the new tights. But, no, I didn’t notice any particularly gay themes – unless you count the more universal theme of how an outsider can be a hero. If anything, heterosexuality was necessary to the plot.

Does this movie play well to kids? My 9, 6, and 3-year-old all loved it and said so (and the baby cooed excitedly a couple of times).

There are a several incredible action sequences that kids of all ages will love. The improvement in the special effects since 1980 is very evident in these sequences. Superman moves quicker at times, and simply floats at other times, the physics just seem more believable.

With A+ being the highest possible mark, I give this film an A. You’ll enjoy it.

I Could Have Seen This One Coming

Just who I wanted to be. Although I note that I’m more nearly Spider-Man than I would have guessed. At least I’m not Wonder Woman — the question about the push-up bra was kind of a giveaway.

Your results:

You are Superman

























Superman
70%
Spider-Man
70%
Green Lantern
65%
Robin
62%
Iron Man
40%
Supergirl
40%
Catwoman
35%
The Flash
35%
Wonder Woman
30%
Hulk
30%
Batman
30%
You are mild-mannered, good,
strong and you love to help others.


Click here to take the Superhero Personality Quiz

Via Leviathan Slayer

Love that Curry

Turns out it loves me back:

Curcumin is an inexpensive dietary supplement that offers powerful protection for aging brains. It has been used as a food additive for thousands of years in the East as the active ingredient in turmeric, or yellow curry spice. Recently, curcumin’s many benefits are being uncoverd by Western and Eastern gerontologists (scientists and clinicians who study the aging process). Curcumin has many effects when we eat it as a nutritional supplement, but the most important one seems to be that it reduces the buildup of Alzheimer’s-related amyloid in our brains as we age.

Tastes great. Wards off Alzheimer’s. That’s a pretty good combo. Apparently, it does turn your brain yellow, but I can live with that.

Read the whole thing.

Did Technology Peak in the 1970s?

kitchen.gifSingularity watchers believe technology is advancing, but David Bodanis, a former Oxford University lecturer, trend consultant for BMW, and author of E=mc2: A Biography of the World’s Most Famous Equation, thinks the really important innovations happened 30 years ago–and Americans are just repackaging them in with slick graphics and marketing gimmicks.

In reality, says Bodanis in an article he wrote for the current issue of Discover Magazine, America is advancing more slowly than other countries because:

A) We have so much invested in our success this far–we can’t afford the risk and downtime for innovation
B) We’re bogged down in patent costs and risk management
C) Careers in the hard sciences don’t pay enough to be attractive
D) Americans are balancing the urge to explore new frontiers with the desire to cocoon at home

Read the whole story…

It's Space Arkapalooza!

So much great stuff, where do we start?

Kathy kicked us off with an intriguing discussion triggered by Stephen Hawking’s recent comments about space and humanity’s survival.

Stephen (Gordon) quickly followed suit.

Then came the Space Ark Survey.

And now we have several new space-ark-related future scenarios on the L2si / Time Highway site ready for rating / commentary (or refutation via additional scenarios!)

We’ll Go to the Moon

We’ll Go to Mars

We’ll Go to the Stars

We’ll Build a Dyson Sphere

spaceark.jpg

Have we missed anything? I doubt it, seeing as we’ve been over all this before.

Gosh, this is so much fun it almost makes me wish the world was ending right now!

It’s Space Arkapalooza!

So much great stuff, where do we start?

Kathy kicked us off with an intriguing discussion triggered by Stephen Hawking’s recent comments about space and humanity’s survival.

Stephen (Gordon) quickly followed suit.

Then came the Space Ark Survey.

And now we have several new space-ark-related future scenarios on the L2si / Time Highway site ready for rating / commentary (or refutation via additional scenarios!)

We’ll Go to the Moon

We’ll Go to Mars

We’ll Go to the Stars

We’ll Build a Dyson Sphere

spaceark.jpg

Have we missed anything? I doubt it, seeing as we’ve been over all this before.

Gosh, this is so much fun it almost makes me wish the world was ending right now!

Will the Space Ark Have an In-Flight Movie?

James Pinkerton has written an excellent article over at Tech Central Station entitled “The Ultimate Life Boat.”

Hawking believes that human destructiveness, combined with bad luck, could destroy [civilization and]… the entire ecosystem…

If Hawking is right about this impending risk, then we have a duty to listen, and to act — even if that means going where no man has gone before. That’s how we can keep the partnership between the generations in force; we don’t have to keep faith with the past and the future only from the platform of this planet.

We’ve written about some of these risks here and here at The Speculist.

Humanity can take steps right away to improve our chances in the event of a global disaster. Pinkerton mentioned the Svalbard Global Seed Vault. This arctic “doomsday vault” will be the largest and most diverse collection of seeds in the world – a Fortress of Solitude – for food.

But Stephen Hawking and Pinkerton are right about the ultimate answer to this risk – permanent off-world colonies. Such colonies would serve to protect humanity from extinction in most disaster scenarios.

Pinkerton thinks there is a danger of humanity turning inward to virtual reality without having a physical presence elsewhere. While it might be nice to plug in to a virtual heaven-on-earth, it wouldn’t save us from a meteor strike.

I think it will go the other way. VR can promote the possibility of settling off-world. You’d think that settling an inhospitable planet like Mars would be no day at the beach – but with VR it could be exactly that. Settlers could live in their own virtual Malibu mansions by the sea while physically being in places that most people would never choose to be.

The Future is Waiting

[Note: This entry is staying at the top for a while, until everyone gets the chance to try out the new Future Prediction website and it starts to take on a life of its own.]

NEWER UPDATE: Ning is back. Here’s an interesting prediction, seemingly related to this entry.

UPDATE: As of 7:45 AM Mountain time, Ning is still down, even though we’re well past midnight pacific time — the promised deadline for being back up and running. Stay tuned.

OLDER UPDATE: Now the predictions are starting to trickle in. New predictions range from the thought-provoking to the vastly unlikely, the practical and discussion-worthy, and the downright creepy. Plus, at least one takes us to new heights, transcending imagination and inspiration. Moreover, a self-proclaimed gleeful sociopath is getting in on the fun. Who’s next?

Hey, I thought you people were interested in the future. We’re getting no action on our new Future Prediction website. None. Zip. A few brave souls the first couple of days and then total radio silence.

<nagging> Night and day, day and night, work my fingers to the bone trying to give you all a nice place to talk about the future and this is the thanks I get? Well, I just hope you’re all proud of yourselves. </nagging>

Background information here. The Prediction site itself is here.

hdr_predict.jpg

For those who inquired about my special <nagging> tag — that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Let’s hope I don’t have to use any of these:

<rant>

<tirade>

<incoherentrambling>

<GrandpaSimpson>

<Philhastotallylostitdudesletsbail>