Daily Archives: June 5, 2006

You Decide

Micah Glasser, visionary or shamless shill for big oil?

So this got me thinking: all that carbon dioxide we keep dumping into the atmosphere via combustion could be a global fortune rather than a disaster. Just imagine molecular manufacturing on a global scale that produced almost every economic good out of carbon directly from the atmosphere while using sunlight as the power.

I’m going with visionary, myself. On the other hand, Micah, if you are shilling, I have now linked you and I want my cut.

But seriously, I like this model. All those years of polluting the atmosphere with carbon turn out to be somewhat akin to a squirrel burying acorns. But wouldn’t there also be a danger in taking too much carbon out of the atmosphere — more than we put in? And then what would we get? An ice age?

A Modest Proposal for Our Times

Ravenwood has it all figured out:

You can ban cell phones if you want, but people are still gonna have accidents. The real problem with car accidents is the drivers. You ban drivers and the accident rate drops to zero almost immediately.

Or let’s go it one better even than that — just ban cars and then there will be nothing for the drivers to drive. This reminds me of one of the rarely considered upsides to abortion — aborted children never become smokers.

Fresh Meat

Dinosaur meat, that is:

After 68 million years in the ground, a Tyrannosaurus rex found in Montana was dug up, its leg bone was broken in pieces, and fragments were dissolved in acid in Schweitzer’s laboratory at North Carolina State University in Raleigh. “Cool beans,” she says, looking at the image on the screen.

It was big news indeed last year when Schweitzer announced she had discovered blood vessels and structures that looked like whole cells inside that T. rex bone—the first observation of its kind. The finding amazed colleagues, who had never imagined that even a trace of still-soft dinosaur tissue could survive. After all, as any textbook will tell you, when an animal dies, soft tissues such as blood vessels, muscle and skin decay and disappear over time, while hard tissues like bone may gradually acquire minerals from the environment and become fossils. Schweitzer, one of the first scientists to use the tools of modern cell biology to study dinosaurs, has upended the conventional wisdom by showing that some rock-hard fossils tens of millions of years old may have remnants of soft tissues hidden away in their interiors. “The reason it hasn’t been discovered before is no right-thinking paleontologist would do what Mary did with her specimens. We don’t go to all this effort to dig this stuff out of the ground to then destroy it in acid,” says dinosaur paleontologist Thomas Holtz Jr., of the University of Maryland. “It’s great science.” The observations could shed new light on how dinosaurs evolved and how their muscles and blood vessels worked. And the new findings might help settle a long-running debate about whether dinosaurs were warmblooded, coldblooded—or both.

On the inevitable question about whether these surviving soft tissues mught contain genetic material capable of enabling a real-life Jurassic Park, Mary Schweitzer won’t commit. But it doesn’t look particularly good. DNA molecules don’t keep very well over the long term, and are easily contaminated.

Schweitzer’s greatest annoyance is that her discovery is now being used by young-earth-creationists to demonstrate the “fact” that dinosaurs didn’t really live that long ago, and were contemporary with human beings. But a lot of us knew that, anyhow.

fred.jpg