Author Archives: Phil Bowermaster

Summer Hiatus

FastForward Radio is taking a few weeks of this summer, but the show goes on. You know how on the weekends they play those old Coast to Coast AMs with Art Bell? It’s kind of like that.

Last week we revisited two shows, one about future Salons with guest Wayne Radinsky and one involving speculations about the distant future.

This week we present our first-ever interview with Jim Elvidge, author of The Universe: Solved! who makes the case that our entire universe may be an elaborate simulation. Bonus: part one of a discussion about Future Ethics.

Next week we’ll conclude the discussion of future ethics packaged up with a show about weird science. Don’t miss it!

Live shows resume August 1.

A New Declaration — FastForward Radio

There are revolutions and then there are revolutions. It’s one thing to throw off an old form of government in favor of a new one, but what about throwing off an entire mode of existence in favor of a new one?

Phil and Stephen celebrate US Independence Day with a new declaration to kick off what may be the biggest revolution of them all.

PLUS:

Higgs Boson Update

Desalination Breakthrough

Prometheus theories

And lots of other speculicious goodness.

Join us:

Thursday 5 July 2012, 7 PM PDT / 10 PM EDT

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

 

Declaration of Singularity

IN CONGRESS, SOME UNSPECIFIED DATE IN THE FUTURE
The unanimous Declaration of the new posthuman civilization

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men human beings sentient beings of human-level or greater intelligence are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator, the Designer of the Simulation in Which We Find Ourselves, or a universe-intrinsic Self-Improving Evolutionary/Developmental process with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life of indefinite duration, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments technologies and economic activity are instituted among men intelligent beings, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed participants. That whenever any form of government civilization becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute a new government civilization, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments cultures long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind intelligent beings are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce constrain them under the absolute Despotism of remaining in the current developmental stage, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government civilization, and to provide new Guards for their future security.

Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies beings ; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government civilization. The history of the present King of Great Britain Post-Industrial Age is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment prevention of an absolute tyranny the further evolution of over these states beings. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

In the face of unrelenting progress, this civilization has continued to harken back to “natural” limitations of development which must never be challenged.

It has promoted and enforced harmful and prejudicial distinctions between human and non-human intelligence.

It has set artificial and arbitrary limits as to duration of lifespan.

It has enforced meaningless distinctions between labor and leisure.

It has equipped despotic governments and enterprises to restrict the means of production and self-expression to a limited few.

It has promoted the creation of artificial boundaries between creative minds.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America all sentient beings of human-level or greater intelligence, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world, the aforementioned Simulation Designer or the aforementioned Evolutionary/Developmental process, for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies beings, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies beings are, and of right ought to be a free and independent states civilization; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown current human civilization, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain Post-Industrial World, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as a free and independent states civilization, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, live, interact, create, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states a civilization may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, the Simulation Designer, or the Evolutionary/developmental Process we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

Bringing Dead Matter to Life — FastForward Radio

Futurist Colin McInnes joins Phil and Stephen to discuss hios controversial essay: Bringing Dead Matter to Life.

They explore how dead matter comes to life — first at the molecular level and then at the planetary level, why no one should be freaking out about gray goo and other shock scenarios, and why the fate of humanity and the planet depends on our elarning to overcome our lack of confidence.

 

About Our Guest:

Colin McInnes is Director of the Advanced Space Concepts Laboratory at the University of Strathclyde. His work includes the investigation of families of novel spacecraft orbits and their mission applications, autonomous control of multiple spacecraft systems and advanced space concepts. His recent work involves exploring new approaches to spacecraft orbital dynamics at extremes of spacecraft length-scale as a means of supporting future space-derived products and services. He has been the recipient of national and international awards including  the Royal Aeronautical Society Pardoe Space Award (2000) and the Ackroyd Stuart Propulsion Prize (2003). More recently he was awarded a Leonov medal by the International Association of Space Explorers in September 2007. Over the last ten years McInnes’ work has been funded by a diverse range of international partners including research councils, agencies, and leading players in the aerospace industry. He currently holds an Advanced Investigator Grant from the European Research Council.


 

Join us:

Wednesday 27 June 2012, 7 PM PDT / 10 PM EDT

 

On to the Stars — FastForward Radio

This week NASA announced that the Voyager 1 probe, launched in 1977, may soon reach interstellar space — if it has not done so already. Let the star age begin!

Hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon discuss the significance of this milestone and explore how and when humanity might truly begin to venture to the stars.

 

Topics & Links

Voyager

What an amazing run it has had.

And now it’s going where no one has gone before.

Voyager contains a special message for anyone who might  eventually happen to find it.

 

Pioneer 10 

Also credited with having left the solar system — way back in 1983 — when it passed Pluto’s orbit.

Also carries a special message to anyone who might happen upon it one day.

 

Plans for traveling into interstellar space:

The 100-Year Starship Program

Several interesting possible approaches from NASA:

 

Von Neumann Probes:

Good stuff from David Brin:

Additional good stuff from George Dvorsky:

 

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

Hybrid Reality — FastForward Radio

Ayesha Khanna joins  Phil and Stephen to discuss her book Hybrid Reality. Co-authored with Parag Khanna, Hybrid Reality explores the frontier of the information revolution: The Hybrid Age, making the case that what human civilization needs more than anything is not greater IQ or EQ, but TQ: technology quotient.

Has “balance of innovation” superseded the military “balance of power” as a measure of national potential? How are the smartest countries, cities, and companies  harnessing new technologies to gain an edge? Moreover, what role does TQ play in adapting to a future in which robots are normal social actors in our lives, healthcare becomes a vehicle for physical enhancement, academic pedigree dissolves in a global skills market, and virtual currencies enable tax-free transactions?

Join us as we explore these critical issues.

About our Guest

Ayesha Khanna is Founder and Director of the Hybrid Reality Institute, a research and advisory group focused on human-technology co-evolution and geotechnology. She is a Partner at K2S Advisors which provides strategic and financial advisory services in smart and sustainable cities, technology and infrastructure. She is also a Faculty Advisor at Singularity University and directs the Future Cities group at the London School of Economics. A technology and innovation strategy expert, Ayesha has over ten years of experience advising clients and cities on scenario analysis, product development,  digital branding and customer experience. Her clients have included Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, UBS, American International Group, and Deutsche Bank. Ayesha is frequently interviewed in the media and was recently featured by the New York Times. She is a regular speaker at industry, marketing, and academic conferences related to emerging technology trends and intelligent cities.

Ayesha is the author of  Straight Through Processing (Reed Elsevier, 2007), and was series editor of The Complete Technology Guides for Financial Services published by Reed Elsevier. She has also written for diverse publications such as BusinessWeek, TIME, Newsweek, Forbes, Strategy+Business, and Foreign Policy. She also blogs on human technology co-evolution at Big Think. She is currently working on the book The Generative City.

Ayesha is on the Scientific Advisory Board of the Lifeboat Foundation, a Fellow at the Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies and co-curator of TEDxGotham. In 2010, she co-chaired the Innovation Advisory Board for the New York City congressional campaign of Reshma Saujani.

Ayesha has a BA (honors) in Economics from Harvard University, an MS in Operations Research from Columbia University and is writing her PhD in Information Systems and Innovation at the London School of Economics.

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

Discounting the Future — FastForward Radio

Stephen Pinker, writing in The Better Angels of Our Nature:

It makes no sense to scrimp all your life so that you can have one hell of a ninetieth birthday bash. Self-indulgence becomes irrational only when we discount the future too steeply—when we devalue our future selves way below what they should be worth given the chance that those selves will still be around to enjoy what we’ve saved for them. There is an optimum rate of discounting the future—mathematically, an optimum interest rate—which depends on how long you expect to live, how likely you will get back what you saved, how long you can stretch out the value of a resource, and how much you would enjoy it at different points in your life.

So — is FastForward Radio steering people wrong when we tell them to focus on the future? Exactly how steeply should the future be discounted in an era of accelerating change?

You could die tomorrow. You could live another 50 years. Or maybe you could live another 500 years. So how much is your future worth? And which estimate do you use to value it?

Tune in and we’ll explore!

Plus — Paul Victor Vasquez joins us to talk about United Stewardship Alliance’s latest uChallenge.

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

Predicting the Present — FastForward Radio

Last week we talked about fallible vs. infallible futurism. We demonstrated how predictions can be phrased in such a way that they are never wrong.

That can be an important skill, what with the future being so difficult to predict. But it isn’t just the future — sometimes we can’t even predict the present.

To demonstrate, Phil  has put together five groups of headlines taken from recent news stories about science and technology. All of these headlines have to do with some scientific or technological breakthrough. Each of the five groups contain three headlines, two of which are real and one of which is fake.

In each instance, Stephen will attempt to identify the fake.

Sound easy? Listen along and see how well you do!

Here’s the list of headlines. (Answers are here, but it’s more fun to listen along with the show.)

Newly Discovered “Monster Planet” Rewrites Rules for Gas Giants, Rocky Worlds
Soviet Moon Lander Discovered Water on The Moon in 1976
SpaceX capsule has ‘new car’ smell, astronauts say
Face-reading software to judge the mood of the masses
Modified Nintendo Wii System Provides Oil Rig Management Interface
Mind-controlled video games become reality
Avengers Inspires Real-Life “Iron Man”
New adhesive device could let humans walk on walls
Teenager finds solution to 350 year old math and physics problem
New stem cell technique promises abundance of key heart cells
Electronic implants restore, enhance sense of smell
Nanomedicines on their way through the body
3D blood vessels could aid artificial organs
Robotic jellyfish could one day patrol oceans, clean oil spills, and detect pollutants
Linux could soon replace Mac OS on select laptop models


Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

Infallible Futurism — FastForward Radio

This program may well be the most important 60 minutes of your entire life…

…or possibly not.

If you phrase your predictions the right way, they can’t be wrong.

Is there any value in infallible futurism? And what is its relationship to the fallible kind?

Hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon talk about why we need both kinds, and why it’s important not to confuse to the two.

Thanks to John Friesen for sharing the excellent photo on Facebook.


Join us:

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

 

The Big Fork — FastForward Radio

Increasingly two models for the near future compete for our attention. We’ll call one model Abundance and the otherLimits to Growth. The former tells us that circumstances are improving and are likely to continue to improve; the latter says that a big reckoning is on its way.

A recent debate at TED between Paul Gilding and Peter Diamandis captures the issues pretty succinctly. So who’s right?

Hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon discuss.

Plus: other future-related topics, including:

Google getting smarter 

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio