Author Archives: Phil Bowermaster

FastForward Radio — The Jobless Boom

Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon welcome futurist Alvis Brigis back to FastForward Radio to discuss how accelerating technological development (particularly automation) is driving economic change. Will these transformations bring about greater prosperity? Will they lead to the end of employment as we know it?

 

FFRNewLogo9J.jpg

 

 

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

 
 

Thumbnail image for Alvis_Smiley_Profile_Pic.jpgAbout our guest

Alvis Brigis is writer, video producer and social media entrepreneur focused on the human side of accelerating change.  He’s worked extensively in reality and documentary television, co-founded future portal MemeBox.com and serves on the board of the Acceleration Studies Foundation.  Alvis blogs about the presnet day “human creativity explosion”, which he sees as an autocatalytic component of broader acceleration, and near-term social change at socialnode.com.  He’s currently based in balmy Mountain View, CA as well as snowy Elka Park, NY. 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Future Economy Survey

Continuing our exploration of what accelerating technological development (especially increasing automation) means for the job market and the future economy, here’s a survey that addresses some of the possible scenarios we have been talking about:

  • A largely stagnant economy not too unlike what we’ve seen over the past decade
  • A huge welfare state wherein the government pays us all to keep consuming.
  • A booming corporate economy in which the vast majority of us work completely made-up and meaningless jobs which the companies all support just to keep consumer activity alive.
  • A massive depression in which rampant automation kills the majority of jobs and destroys the economy in the process
  • A “maker” economy in which we eke out a living through micro business opportunities online and actually producing our own stuff
  • A super prosumer economy in which automation enables massive empowerment and enrichment the workforce through our own creativity and initiative.

Which of these scenarios sounds most likely to you for the near and long term? Or describe your own if none of these sound right.

Results are here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

FastForward Radio — Living Past 200, Alien Life, and Tricky Predictions

Phil  and Stephen welcome Michael Anissimov back to FastForward Radio to continue last week’s discussion about increases in human life expectancy.

Also on the agenda:

Last week’s big news from NASA about the discovery of “alien” life

The recent IEEE report on Ray Kurzweil’s missed predictions
 
About our guest:

Michael Anissimov is a science / technology writer and consultant. He is the creative force behind one of the leading futurist blogs, Accelerating Future. He is a co-founder of the Immortality Institute and the Media Director for the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence.



FFRNewLogo9J.jpg

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

The Jobless Boom?

Groupon logo.

Image via Wikipedia

We’ve talked about the idea of a jobless recovery leading to a long-term lack of jobs, but how about something even stranger — a jobless boom. Our buddy Alvis Brigis lays it out in a piece that is somewhere between blog post and manifesto. The salient points, neatly summarized by Alvis:

    •  American  job losses will continue due to a convergence of big forces including offshoring  and automation driven by accelerating change.  Service sector jobs will  generally not return.
    •  Social  web business models are flourishing and point the way to new jobs and efficiencies.
    • A new class of Super Prosumer companies like Groupon are poised to explode and return more value to people, creating more jobs, but driving price points lower.
    • We need to encourage the development of Super Prosumer companies on U.S. soil across various industries and become a Prosumer Nation.

Actually, “jobless” boom is not quite accurate. Alvis states that the very trends and technologies which are eliminating jobs are simultaneously fueling the growth of social networks and a whole new economy around them. Unfortunately, that economy is going to have to boom, boom, boom — which it may well do — to generate the kind of economic activity we’ll need to get all those who’ve lost jobs back on their feet.

FarmVille

Image via Wikipedia

Even then, I’m not clear on what a “booming” prosumer economy looks like. How do we make our money? Our new infrastructure has to enable the creation of new value, extrinsic value. I don’t see how we can all make a living playing Farmville or clipping coupons. Somehow, that feels like an economy based on taking in each other’s washing.

On the other hand…

Some portion of the economy and the workforce will have to continue to be devoted to the production of actual stuff (unless / until we can each produce our own stuff.) Another large segment of the workforce will be devoted to adding value to that process. But in a prosumer model, everybody adds value, all the way down the chain. So as long as automation and new efficiencies are creating lots of stuff, while human beings create new ideas, content, ways of interacting — all of which add value — maybe we CAN have an economy where a signficant portion of the “workforce” makes a living playing games or clipping coupons.

This sounds crazy, but when we discussed these transformations a few months ago, we narrowed it down to a few alternative scenarios:

  1. A huge welfare state wherein the government pays us all to keep consuming.
  2. A booming corporate economy in which the vast majority of us work completely made-up and meaningless jobs* which the companies all support just to keep consumer activity alive.
  3. A massive depression in which rampant automation kills the majority of jobs and destroys the economy in the process
  4. A ”lucky break” scenario where we hit some form of equilibrium, allowing large numbers of human beings to continue to make a meaningful contribution to the economy and be rewarded accordingly

Maybe the Prosumer Nation model is one way of getting a lucky break. I certainly like the idea of people playing Farmville or clipping coupons for a living better than those other three possibilities.

Alvis has some thoughts on the success of Groupon, recently valued at around $6 billion:

This is a MIND-BOGGLING figure, especially for a company that many scoffed at not too long ago and that initially set out to “organize collective action around social or charitable causes”.  Never before has a company reached $2 billion in annual revenue in just 2 years time.  Never before has a company been offered $6 billion just 2 years into its existence (other than spin-off companies).

Particularly interesting is the trendline of valuations.  Going back just one decade we can see acceleration at work.  Youtube was purchased by google for $1.65 billion after just 18 months of existence.  Farmville creator Zynga is said to be worth $5.5 billion just 3 years into its life.  Secondary market shares of Facebook are reported to be trading at a value of $50 billion after 6 years. And now Groupon has claimed the crown of fastest growing company in the history of planet Earth. The speed at which a company can be organized and scale is clearly accelerating.

How far can that go? It’s hard to say. Robin Hanson makes the case that in the not too distant future, the acceleration of economic growth will provide us an economy that doubles once a week – or maybe even more rapidly than that.

Combine that prediction with the idea of a Prosumer economy and there’s a jobless boom for you — a future in which no one cares about whether they get to be famous for 15 minutes, because we each (and I mean every single one of us) get to own our own multi-billion-dollar startup.

Works for me!

 

UPDATE: More thoughts on all this from Will Brown.

 

*Insert obvious snarky comment about your own job here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Immortality Made Easy

Apparently, you can start immediately:

    • Adopt a hunter-gatherer lifestyle after 35 to 40 if Eurasian, earlier if ancestry is less Eurasian.  
    • If younger than 30 and Eurasian, continue on a post-agricultural revolution diet (or Andrew Weil-style diet).
    • Use the best modern medicine
    • Use autologous (from your own cells) tissue repair as it becomes available in five or more years
    • Use next-generation pharmaceuticals in the next 10 or more years

As reported by Kurzweil AI, this outline for how to put aging in check comes from evolutionary biologist Michael Rose as expounded at the Humanity+ conference at Caltech.

Rose isn’t the first to suggest that diet could be a key in slowing aging, but his ideas about changing diet throughout the course of one’s life are certainly unusual.

Sounds good — maybe a little too easy?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

New Life Form Discovered

UPDATE: As we discussed on a subsequent FastForward Radio, this story has been almost completely discredited. Sorry I got all excited over nothing.

 

Per Gizmodo, NASA is preparing to announce the discovery of an entirely new form of life:

Hours before their special news conference today, the cat is out of the bag: NASA has discovered a completely new life form that doesn’t share the biological building blocks of anything currently living in planet Earth. This changes everything.

At their conference today, NASA scientist Felisa Wolfe Simon will announce that they have found a bacteria whose DNA is completely alien to what we know today. Instead of using phosphorus, the bacteria uses arsenic. All life on Earth is made of six components: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur. Every being, from the smallest amoeba to the largest whale, share the same life stream. Our DNA blocks are all the same.

But not this one. This one is completely different. We knew that there were bacteria that processed arsenic, but this bacteria–discovered in the poisonous Mono Lake, California–is actually made of arsenic. The phosphorus is absent from its DNA. The implications of this discovery are enormous to our understanding of life itself and the possibility of finding beings in other planets that don’t have to be like planet Earth.

Interesting conversation developing in the comments on the Gizmodo story — people trying to figure out how significant this is, some expressing disappointment that what’s being announced is not the discovery of alien life.

Two points I’d like to make on that.

1. This is huge. How can anyone not see tthat this is huge?

2. Of course it’s alien life. Whether it developed on this planet independently  or it was deposited here by some meteor — this is alien life.

To borrow a phrase from our most recent podcast, this is at the very least a “proof of concept” for alien life.

If it’s from this planet, is there some path by which it could have evolved from common ancestors of the rest of the biosphere? If so, how could that have happened? Every other living thing on earth shares the same chemistry — but not these bacteria.

And if it’s NOT from this planet…

Let’s just say that raises some questios, too.

Enhanced by Zemanta

FastForward Radio — The 200 Year Lifespan

Phil, Stephen, and special guest Brian Wang discuss the possibility of average
life expectancy jumping up to 100, 200, or  500 — or even older! Crazy
pipedream or soon-to-be-realized scenario?

Tune in and find out!

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

About Our Guest:

Brian Wang is a futurist
who blogs about all things future-related at href="http://nextbigfuture.com/">NextBigFuture.
He is the Director of Research for the Lifeboat Foundation and a member
of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology Task Force.
Brian-Wang-sm.jpg

Enhanced by Zemanta

Aging Reversed?

Mice with different coat colors.

Image via Wikipedia

Stop the presses.

Before you complete our latest survey, consider this:

Scientists Find Way to Partially Reverse Aging in Mice

U.S. scientists say they have partially reversed age-related degeneration in mice, leading to new brain and testes growth, improved fertility and the return of lost cognitive function, or thinking skills.

The advance in aging science was achieved by working with telomerase genes in the mice, said the team at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.

The researchers developed mice with a controllable telomerase gene. (Telomerase is an enzyme that helps maintain telomeres — the protective “caps” on the ends of chromosomes.) As people age, low levels of telomerase lead to progressive erosion and shortening of the telomeres, resulting in physical and mental decline, the study authors explained in a news release from the institute.

Creating mice with a controllable telomerase switch enabled the scientists to create prematurely aged mice. The switch also enabled the team to determine that reactivating telomerase in the mice could restore telomeres and reduce the signs and symptoms of aging.

In addition, the mice did not show signs of cancer — a key concern because cancer cells can use telomerase to make themselves virtually immortal. Researchers noted that this is an important area of study for future investigation.

One important note: the aging that is reversed in this study is a rapid-aging effect due to disease a la Benjamin Button. It’s great if this rare form of rapid aging becomes treatable, but the extent to which such treatments would be applicable to regular aging is not known.

Even so, it’s definitely a step in the right direction.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Life Expectancy 200 and Beyond

Christian Henrik Nesheim of I Look Forward To wrote me last week inviting me to participate in his latest futurist survey, this time on the subject of life expectancy.
 
The question was as follows:

In which decade do you think medicine will enable a human life expectancy of 200 years, and why in this particular decade?

I was swamped with pre-holiday work and then the holiday itself, so I didn’t get my answer back to Christian before he published responses from Aubrey de Grey (cautiously optimistic) and David Brin (skeptical).

My own response was:

It’s very difficult to pin something like this down to a decade, or even a quarter or half century. I think there are people alive today who will live to see 200 — I would like to be one of them. But when does that possibility begin to materialize? I think we might see life expectancy pass 100 by mid-century, and 100 years after that (2150) we’ll have many individuals hitting the 200 mark, and good reason to believe that others will do so.

Of course, the arrival of molecular nanotechnology or strong AI (either or both of which could happen before 2150) will make those time frames obsolete.

As always, I’m interested to learn what you think.

Before the question comes up, yes I DO believe that it’s possible to establish a life expectancy of, say, 300 even if no one has yet reached that age. If you disagree, please choose time frames that you think are appropriate.

Survey Results are here.

Welcome Instapundit readers, and thanks for taking the survey. Here’s some late-breaking news that might give you cause to reconsider your answers. 

 

“Other” responses below.

Enhanced by Zemanta