Daily Archives: October 24, 2006

A Plausible Scenario

A voice speaks to us from the future:

At our local mall, events-management sub-engines emit floods of locative data. So if Debbie and me sneak in there, looking for some private place to get horizontal, all the vidcams swivel our way. Then a rent-a-cop shows up. What next? Should we go to Lovers’ Lane? There aren’t any! They eliminated all those! They were tracked down with satellites and abolished with Google Maps.

Okay, sure: I know I sound pretty depressed. Us teenage poets depress easily. You know what they tell me whenever I rant like this? “Get a hobby.” Play imaginary fantasy computer games! That is allowed me! Wow, thanks! When she nursed me as a baby, my Mom dropped me right on my head to play Wonder-World of Witchcraft. I sure know where that story goes. If “religion is the opiate of the people”, then immersive multiplayer 3D virtual worlds are hard-core Afghani heroin. My Mom will never make it back into the labor force: Mom’s way too busy building herself up to 146th-level SuperMasonic Tolkien-Fantasy Ultra-Elf Queen. Like that helps! Look, I can show you Mom’s gaming environment, right on the screen here. My Mom’s a Welfare Elf Queen (CR) (system crash) (hard reboot)

…or at least a future, brought to us by science fiction author Bruce Sterling. Great title, too. By all means, read the whole thing.

This Doesn't Take Long

And it is preferable to doing nothing, which is what I am forced to admit has been my default position. Take two minutes out of your day. Or, if for whatever reason you don’t think this is the right approach, take a few minutes and work on something you do consider constructive. (And tell us about it.) I see the logic of this kind of analysis, but ultimately don’t find it persuasive. To stand by and do nothing in the face of genocide because of all the awful criticism that will be thrown one’s way is not leadership. And I’m talking about the US as a whole, not just our president. The argument that taking action would create logisitical challenges to other, more vital, concerns seems more valid but is also less than 100% satisfactory.

I don’t pretend to have all the answers — or any answers, really. But I believe that doing something is better than doing nothing.

This Doesn’t Take Long

And it is preferable to doing nothing, which is what I am forced to admit has been my default position. Take two minutes out of your day. Or, if for whatever reason you don’t think this is the right approach, take a few minutes and work on something you do consider constructive. (And tell us about it.) I see the logic of this kind of analysis, but ultimately don’t find it persuasive. To stand by and do nothing in the face of genocide because of all the awful criticism that will be thrown one’s way is not leadership. And I’m talking about the US as a whole, not just our president. The argument that taking action would create logisitical challenges to other, more vital, concerns seems more valid but is also less than 100% satisfactory.

I don’t pretend to have all the answers — or any answers, really. But I believe that doing something is better than doing nothing.