Daily Archives: January 6, 2006

Robots: The Next Generation

Mark Steyn paints a very pessimistic picture of the developed world’s future in his recent article, “It’s the Demography, Stupid.” Steyn points out that the replacement fertility rate is an average of 2.1 live births per woman. The United States’ birth rate is practically equal to this replacement value at about 2.08 live births per woman.

I’m doing my part.

The population of most of the rest of the developed world is not holding up as well. Japan’s birth rate is 1.39. The European average is very close at about 1.40. This means that both Japan and Europe are losing about a third of their population every generation.

Steyn points out that this is a problem because the typical modern democracy tends to be a welfare state. The only demographic that’s growing – old people – depend on the diminishing young population to pay for their pensions, medicine, and health care.

So Europe has found that it must open its gates to immigration. The problem, for anyone who’s watched what’s going on in France, is that some of these immigrants don’t share a belief in “liberal pluralist democracy.”

I would guess that Japan, with it’s comparably low birthrate, will fare much better in the coming years than Europe. Japan has a stronger tradition of accepting personal sacrifice for the sake of the greater good than socialized Europe. If the population is told that certain welfare programs will have to be cut back, they are likely to accept this quicker and respond faster than Europe.

asimo_500dpi.jpgAlso, there’s the issue of robots. The Economist had an interesting article late last month about how the Japanese are very accepting of robots.

[T]he consensus among Japanese is that visions of a future in which immigrant workers live harmoniously and unobtrusively in Japan are pure fancy. Making humanoid robots is clearly the simple and practical way to go…

In western popular culture, robots are often a threat, either because they are manipulated by sinister forces or because something goes horribly wrong with them. By contrast, most Japanese view robots as friendly and benign.

terminator.jpgAs robots and other AI’s become smarter and more capable every year, this cultural acceptance of robots will become more and more important to Japan. Perhaps Europe will see Japan’s success and adopt robots as well.

How will this affect the United States? We don’t have the same depopulation problem that Europe and Japan have, but we do have the Western distrust for robots. So we don’t need them like Europe or want them like Japan. This probably means we’ll be late adopters, and that could become a major problem for our country. We might learn to upgrade humans to compete with super-efficient robots, but robots will be easier to upgrade or replace as new technology becomes available.

Time will tell.

It's a New Phil, Week 1

I’ve just had my first official weigh-in after beginning a weight loss program recommended (and supervised by) my primary care physician. I had my annual physical a couple of weeks ago and the scales showed an alarming 297 lbs.

Now please note that this was not alarming because of any specific health risks (the general risks associated with lugging that kind of baggage around being more than sufficient), but more because it put me three pounds shy of the big three-oh-oh, which is just not a respectable weight for somebody who isn’t starting for the NFL or who isn’t a Sumo wrestler and I must come clean — neither of those apply to me.

The plan the doc has me on is one of those moderate and super-sensible deals. I count calories, fat, and fiber (the latter being something of a mitigator.) I don’t currently count carbs, although the tools I have could do the math that way. I personally don’t want to go down that road again. As far as I’m concerned, low carb is a mirage in a desert of getting nowhere with diets. (Of course, your mileage may vary.)

One of the interesting features of the program is that I will be cutting my caloric intake further as I lose, so this could potentially begin a foray into the world of CR life extension, although right now — at 1500 calories a day — I think I’m still well north of any CR plan.

Still, you have to crawl before you can walk. And my first week of crawling has resulted in a 7 pound loss. At two-nine-oh, the big three-oh-oh seems a lot less menacing and I plan to see it quickly receding in the old rearview mirror.

More next week.

It’s a New Phil, Week 1

I’ve just had my first official weigh-in after beginning a weight loss program recommended (and supervised by) my primary care physician. I had my annual physical a couple of weeks ago and the scales showed an alarming 297 lbs.

Now please note that this was not alarming because of any specific health risks (the general risks associated with lugging that kind of baggage around being more than sufficient), but more because it put me three pounds shy of the big three-oh-oh, which is just not a respectable weight for somebody who isn’t starting for the NFL or who isn’t a Sumo wrestler and I must come clean — neither of those apply to me.

The plan the doc has me on is one of those moderate and super-sensible deals. I count calories, fat, and fiber (the latter being something of a mitigator.) I don’t currently count carbs, although the tools I have could do the math that way. I personally don’t want to go down that road again. As far as I’m concerned, low carb is a mirage in a desert of getting nowhere with diets. (Of course, your mileage may vary.)

One of the interesting features of the program is that I will be cutting my caloric intake further as I lose, so this could potentially begin a foray into the world of CR life extension, although right now — at 1500 calories a day — I think I’m still well north of any CR plan.

Still, you have to crawl before you can walk. And my first week of crawling has resulted in a 7 pound loss. At two-nine-oh, the big three-oh-oh seems a lot less menacing and I plan to see it quickly receding in the old rearview mirror.

More next week.