Steller Cartography

By | January 31, 2006

Most of us at some point had to learn the names of the nine planets, but for some reason few of us know anything about the geography of our immediate galactic neighborhood. You’re probably aware that the Alpha-Centauri system is the closest to our sun, but can you name any other close stars?

I couldn’t. Since we geeks have been dreaming of traveling the stars at least since the golden age of sci-fi, you’d think we’d know more about where we’d like to travel.

nearstar.gif

Click image to enlarge.

Here are the closest 10 star systems (from closest on out):

  1. Alpha Centauri is a triple star system located about 4.3 light years away. The closest of the three stars is the tiny red dwarf, Proxima Centauri. The other two stars rotate around each other at the distance Saturn is from our Sun. They are both close to our sun in size and temperature.

    most astronomers believe that stars of spectral types from about F5 to K5 are hot enough, but long-lived and stable enough, to support potential Earthlike worlds.

    Both Alpha Centauri A and B fall within this range. Alpha Centauri A is a G star like our Sun, Alpha Centauri B is a K1 star. The star types, from hottest to coolest are O, B, A, F, G, K, M.

    According to Wikipedia, Alpha Centauri A and B rotate at a sufficient distance to allow rocky earth-like worlds with liquid water to rotate either star. Such worlds rotating either star would have a secondary sun at night for half of its year – a prolonged twilight.

    Outer gas giants like Jupiter could not exist in this binary system, and that could be a problem because gas giants are thought to be responsible for bringing comets in to seed inner planets with water and other biological building blocks. But if the twin stars served the same purpose for each other, this might not be a problem at all.

    Viewed from near Alpha Centauri, the sky (other than the Alpha Centauri stars) would appear very much as it does to observers on Earth, with most of the constellations such as Ursa Major and Orion being almost unchanged. However, Centaurus would be missing its brightest star and our Sun would appear as a 0.5-magnitude star in Cassiopeia. Roughly speaking, the // of Cassiopeia would become a ///, with the Sun at the leftmost end…

    You know…in case you ever find yourself in the Alpha Centauri system and need to find your way back home. It’s only “news you can use” around here my friends.

  2. Barnard’s Star is a red dwarf located 5.96 light years away. A red dwarf is a class M star – a star that is too cool to be considered a good candidate for life-bearing worlds.
  3. Wolf 359 is a red dwarf 7.78 light years away.
  4. Lalande 21185 is a red dwarf 8.29 light years away. It is known to have two gas giant planets. A third large planet is suspected.
  5. Sirius is a binary system containing one star that’s thought to be too hot for life (Sirius A) and a white dwarf (Sirius B) that’s far too cool. White dwarves are even cooler than red dwarves. This binary system is 8.58 light years away.
  6. Luyten 726-8 is a binary system of two red dwarves.
  7. Ross 154 – a red dwarf.
  8. Ross 248 is another red dwarf.
  9. Epsilon Eridani is a K1 star, so it falls within the class of stars thought to be capable of supporting life. It is not thought to be a good candidate for complex life though because the star is young, it has an extremely variable spectrum (burning hot then cold), and is orbited by a Jupiter-like gas giant called Epsilon Eridani B in a highly eccentric orbit.

    This star is 10.52 light years away.

  10. Lacaille 9352 is yet another red dwarf 10.74 light years away.

This large number of red dwarves is not unusual. Four out of five stars in the universe are red dwarves. In fact, the only other stars within 13 light years that fall within the F5 to K5 range are Epsilon Indi and Tau Ceti.

Epsilon Indi is orbited at a great distance by a pair of brown dwarves that orbit each other. It is on the cool side of stars capable of supporting Earth-like planets.

Since Epsilon Indi is sort of like a distant cousin to Sol, some speculate whether it might just be bright enough to support Earth-type life on a planet lucky enough to orbit in its water zone. The distance from Epsilon Indi where an Earth-type planet could possibly have liquid water on its surface is centered around only 0.38 AU — around Mercury’s orbital distance in the Solar System.

[an AU, or Astronomical Unit, is the distance between the Earth and the Sun]

Tidal lock might begin to be a problem that close to a star. A planet within the liquid water zone might tend to keep one side toward it’s star like the Moon to the Earth. Such a planet would be burned on one side, rare on the other.

Tau Ceti has a different set of problems. Because it is a metal deficient star it is thought to be unlikely to harbor rocky planets. Tau Ceti is surrounded by a dusty disk filled with comets.

Though the star Tau Ceti is similar to the Sun, any planets it has are unlikely to be havens for life, say a team of UK astronomers. Using submillimeter images of the disk of material surrounding Tau Ceti, they found that it must contain more than ten times as many comets and asteroids than there are in the Solar System.

Bottom line: our best bet for a close Earth-like neighbor lies within the Alpha Centauri system.

naechste.jpg

  • Paul F. Dietz

    Another important thing that happens around small stars is increased impact energy.

    The luminosity of a main sequence star of mass M goes as about M^3.5, so for planets in the habitable zone the energy of the orbit around the star goes as M^-.75. Smaller stars will therefore have habitable planets in more energetic orbits. Asteroid and comet impact energy will scale proportionally to the energy of the orbit (assuming this energy is much greater than the escape energy of the planet itself, as it should be in this case.)

  • https://www.blog.speculist.com Stephen Gordon

    Paul:

    So, you’re saying that an asteriod impact within the habitable zone of a dimmer star would have more energy and would, therefore, be more lethal than an asteriod impact in the habitable zone of our own Sun. Right?

    I suppose it would depend on whether the asteriod hit you coming or going, wouldn’t it?

  • Paul F. Dietz

    Yes, it would have more energy, which presumably would make it more damaging.

    The energy does depend on whether the asteroid is coming or going, but for a given encounter geometry the relative speed scales as I indicated (since the velocities of the planet and the impactor both increase as M^-3/8, and the energy as the square of that.)

  • https://www.blog.speculist.com Stephen Gordon

    Paul:

    I think you’re right because an asteroid would continue to pick up speed as it falls toward the star it is orbiting – eccentrically.

    The closer the earth-like planet has to be to its star to be habitable, the faster a potential impactor would be moving. I buy that.

  • Karl Hallowell

    I see that your primitive culture has finally discovered 3D star maps. You might find this technology useful.

  • http://ywns.livejournal.com Ywns

    If you haven’t seen it, you might want to look in libraries for _Habitable Planets for Man_. I was introduced to it at age 10 or so by a scifi-writer relative. It is a study funded, I believe, by the Rand Corp., to determine the qualities needed for habitable planets. Joe Haldeman reviews it favorably at the Amazon link below. High-gravity planets are likely to be very poor in metals near the surface! Colonists beware. And just how large does a body have to be to escape tidal lock? Dang, I think I’ll re-read it.

    One of the things I valued it for as a geeky young thing was the great star names, my favorites always being the rhyming Sigma Draconis and Delta Pavonis.

    http://www.amazon.com/Habitable-Planets-Man-Stephen-Dole/dp/0444000925

    Nice blog you’ve got. I wandered in off a search for Tau Ceti images.

  • Anonymous

    “Sirius is a binary system containing one star that’s thought to be too hot for life (Sirius A) and a white dwarf (Sirius B) that’s far too cool. White dwarves are even cooler than red dwarves. This binary system is 8.58 light years away.”

    Nearly right – white dwarves are actually hotter than red ones.