Monthly Archives: October 2011

Fast Forward Radio – Interview with author Sonia Arrison

Author Sonia Arrison joins hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon to talk about her book:

 

100 Plus: How the Coming Age of Longevity Will Change Everything,

From Careers and Relationships to Family and Faith.

 

 

Is it possible that living to be 100, 150, 200 or even older will soon be the norm in some parts of the world? How will this happen? What are the implications?

 

soniaarrison3

Tune in and find out!


 

About Our Guest:

Sonia Arrison is an author and policy analyst who has studied the impact of new technologies on society for more than a decade. A Senior Fellow at the California-based Pacific Research Institute(PRI) and aorld, she is author of two previous books (Western Visions and Digital Dialog) as well as numerous PRI studies on technology issues. A frequent media contributor and guest, her work has appeared in many publications including CBS columnist for TechNewsWorld, she is author of two previous books (Western Visions and Digital Dialog) as well as numerous PRI studies on technology issues. A frequent media contributor and guest, her work has appeared in many publications including CBS MarketWatch, CNN, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Wall StreetJournal, and USA Today. She was also the host of a radio show called “digital dialogue” on the Voice America network and has been a repeat guest on National Public Radio, Tech TV, and CNN’s Headline News.

Often asked for advice on technology issues, Sonia has given testimony and served as an expert witness for various government committees such as the Congressional Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce and the California Commission on Internet Political Practices. She is an instructor for California’s Command College and serves on the Board of Trustees for Singularity University. MarketWatch, CNN, Los Angeles Times, New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and USA Today. She was also the host of a radio show called “digital dialogue” on the Voice America network and has been a repeat guest on National Public Radio, Tech TV, and CNN’s Headline News.

FastForward Radio — Drugs Required?

Hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon discuss the possibility that drug usage might one day be required for certain lines of work. In particular, might  doctors be required to take performance-enahncing drugs?

Plus: an Emperor Norton update!

The book Phil mentioned is A Whole New Mind by Daniel Pink. If eating magic mushrooms becomes a job prerequisite it will be because of the shift described in this book.

Listen to internet radio with The Speculist on Blog Talk Radio

Doctors on Drugs

Yes, sometimes the access that doctors have to drugs leads to poor decisions and bad behavior, but that’s not what the title of this piece refers to. We’re asking a totally different question, here: what if doctors were required to take certain drugs?

The question comes from Instapundit, who put it this way:

IF “SMART DRUGS” IMPROVE DOCTORS’ PERFORMANCE, is it malpractice not to take them?

The question is not as facetious as it seems. The linked article describes a study showing that doctors on a performance-enhancing drug called modafinil were able to make better decisions faster than their counterparts who have not taken any “smart” drugs. If smart drug usage becomes a reliable predictor of better outcomes, it’s possible that doctors will feel increasing pressure to take them. It’s even possible that those who do will advertise that fact so that people who want an “enhanced” doctor will know who to look for.

But still, it seems unlikely that it would ever come down to doctors being required to take such drugs. At least it does to us, today. (In a few years the idea might not sound so crazy.) Although it’s not hard to imagine non-performance-enhanced doctors eventually paying higher malpractice insurance premiums.

Requiring performance-enhancing drugs for some occupations might prove a slippery slope. Consider this fascinating development:

Fed-funded research: magic mushrooms create ‘openness’

A single high dose of the hallucinogen psilocybin, the active ingredient in “magic mushrooms,” was enough to bring about a measureable and lasting personality change — “openness” — lasting at least a year in nearly 60 percent of the 51 participants in a new study, say Johns Hopkins researchers.

By “openness,” they mean traits related to imagination, aesthetics, feelings, abstract ideas, and general broad-mindedness, the researchers said. Changes in these traits, measured on a widely used and scientifically validated personality inventory, were larger in magnitude than changes typically observed in healthy adults over decades of life experiences, the scientists say.

As described, “openness” would be a valuable trait for a new hire in any of thousands of different jobs. Maybe the pre-employment screening of the future will be an entirely different kind of drug test — one to make sure that the candidate has eaten hallucinogenic mushrooms at least once in the past year.

(Cross-posted from Transparency Revolution.)

FastForward Radio — Optimism and Health

Hosts Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon discuss whether thinking positive can make a difference in how well we avoid or recover from illness, how we deal with stress and depression, and how long we live.

Also: Have we entered the era of pre-PostWork?

Plus: a grab-bag of futuristic goodness!

Join us:


Steve Jobs and the Art of Reinvention

[I wrote this upon the announcement of Jobs' retirement in August. Jobs reinvented himself, the companies he managed, the personal computer (which he can also get partial credit for inventing in the first place) the music business, and the telephone. To name just a few items.]

At National Review Online, Nick Schulz waxes elegiac about the career of Steve Jobs, describing him as “America’s Greatest Failure” and noting that “Glory is sometimes born of catastrophe.” It may be a distinctly American practice, to write eulogies at the end of a career rather than a life — and here’s hoping that even the career eulogies are premature, that Mr. Jobs finds a path to recovery from his illness and achieves another comeback or three before any real eulogies are written about him.

But as the mantle of Apple Computer CEO passes to new shoulders, it is a good time to reflect on the vivid and indelible mark that Steve Jobs has made on the world of business (and the world in general, for that matter.) Schulz concludes with these thoughts:

There’s a moral here for a Washington culture that fears failure too much. In today’s Washington, large banks aren’t permitted to fail; nor are large auto firms. Next up will be too-big-to-fail hospital systems. Steve Jobs is a reminder that failure is a good and necessary thing. And that sometimes the greatest glories are born of catastrophe.

I don’t entirely disagree with that sentiment, but I think there’s more to be said. Most of the “catastrophes” that Jobs encountered were self-inflicted. And his failures are interesting and instructive precisely because they were followed by subsequent, even more spectacular, successes. Jobs has consistently changed the game by reinventing himself and the companies he managed.

Let’s look at three principles of reinvention reflected in the career of Steve Jobs.

1. First, invent yourself.

Steve Jobs was a hacker, a phone phreaker, and by many accounts something of a hippie in the early days. He was adored, feared, and despised at Apple Computer, the company he co-founded in 1976 with Steve Wozniak. With the Macintosh, he wanted to bring a product to market that was “insanely great” — words that had no small applicability to his own good self. By the time he was fired by former Pepsico CEO John Sculley, the man he personally recruited to run the “business side” of his business, he was larger than life — a man not yet 30 who had already accomplished far more than most of us will ever do.

In a sense, Apple had to let Jobs go because there was just too much of him. He was an overwhelming presence. When he set about to reinvent himself the first time, he had plenty of material to work with.

2. “Stay hungry. Stay foolish.”

Some of you may recognize these words from Stewart Brands’ Whole Earth Catalog, or from Jobs’ quoting them in a famous commencement address he gave at Stanford in 2005. (If you’re not, follow the link and read the address. It will tell you far more about Steve Jobs than I could ever hope to.)

Jobs left Apple, but he stayed hungry. In 1985 he started a new company with as defiant a name as you can imagine: NeXT. It was not the massive large-scale success that Apple was, but its technology was extremely influential — so much so that Apple Computer ultimately came calling and bought Jobs out in order to acquire what would become the basis for a a completely revamped Macintosh operating system. That purchase brought Jobs back in as a consultant to Apple, and soon after as reinstated CEO.

Jobs also stayed foolish. While running NeXT, he bought an interesting little computer graphics outfit from George Lucas, a company that today we all know as PIXAR. Whatever his business reasons for making that purchase, there can be no doubt that a primary part of the attraction was just how cool PIXAR was. It was insanely great, and he was as committed to that ideal as ever. (Of course, we should all suffer from that sort of “foolishness.” Jobs later sold the company to Disney for $7 billion, becoming Disney’s largest shareholder in the process.)

3. Put everything on the line.

Steve Jobs’ reinvention of himself from wunderkind-turned-charlatan/outcast to Triumphant Reconqueror is as inspiring a story as you will find in the annals of American business. But he had only begun to reinvent. We all know about how the iPod led to the iPhone and the iPad — and what tremendous game-changers each of these has been — but it all started with the iMac. Jobs dared to reinvent to the Macintosh itself, making it even more insane and greater than ever.

It’s important to note that the Mac of 1997 was a far cry from the design masterpiece that Jobs introduced in 1984, and was in significant need of reinvention. But that he would stake his company and reclaimed reputation on making a big splash with the very technology that had, in a sense, been his initial undoing…

That took guts.

It takes courage to reinvent yourself. It takes passion. And perhaps it takes a little bit of hunger and little bit of foolishness. Any of us who have experienced failure, or are experiencing it now, should remember that. Steve Jobs has changed our world in many ways, and has shown us that failure need never be the last word. For both of those things, we should be profoundly grateful.