Monthly Archives: October 2009

Great Headline, Great Idea

Every now and then you see something that just puts a smile on your face:

Humans, Shmumans: What Mars Needs Is an Armada of Robots and Blimps

Airships may be the key component in a new robotic system for exploring the celestial bodies most likely to harbor life like Mars and Jupiter’s moon, Titan.

The dirigibles would provide regional observations and autonomous command for ground-based vehicles, while maintaining contact with orbiters.

It’d be a new role for airships, which were the wonder of the aerial world in the days before airplanes (and rockets and space shuttles).

An armada of robots and airships. On Mars! Now that’s the future, folks. The future is supposed to be interesting and fun.

Here’s my artistic take on Mars in the near future:

blimpsonMars.jpg

But where are the robots, you ask? Piloting the blimps, of course.

Climate Change

Lovely autumn scenes from the metro Denver area. About 2 feet so far and now it’s really coming down. I can’t shovel fast enough to keep up.

snowhouse.jpg

snowfence.jpg

That drift on the fence peaks at about eye level, with heavy stuff up to shoulder level.

FastForward Radio — Energy and the Future with Brian Wang

Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon welcome futurist Brian Wang back to FastForward Radio to talk about energy and the future.

  • What role does energy technology play in the unfolding of the major transformations we are currently experiencing?
  • What are the economic impacts of choosing to change energy sources…or choosing not to change?

  • What are the unexpected energy solutions that might prove to be game-changers?

Tune in and find out!

FFRNewLogo9J.jpg

Archived recording available here:

Listen to FastForward Radio... on Blog Talk Radio






About Our Guest

Brian Wang is a futurist
who blogs about all things future-related at href="http://nextbigfuture.com/">NextBigFuture.
He is the Director of Research for the Lifeboat Foundation and a member
of the Center for Responsible Nanotechnology Task Force.
Brian-Wang-sm.jpg

Mindfiles, Mindware and Mindclones

A friend on Facebook posted a link to this site. This is a must-see for Singulatarians. Martine Rothblatt posts one answer to one interesting question on issues familiar to Singulatarians every few weeks. These are in-depth answers. There is real meat here.

Here are some of the questions: How can consciousness be created in software? What is cyberconsciousness. Why worry about this sci-fi stuff now?

The sub-title of the site expresses her goal for the site: “One hundred questions answered about the coming age of our own cyberconsciousness and techno-immortality.” She is now up to number 8: What is techno-immortality? Here is part of her answer:

Therefore, by techno-immortal, we do not literally mean living until the sun explodes and the stars disappear. Such eschatological timeframes are beyond our consideration. Techno-immortality means living so long that death (other than by suicide) is not thought of as a factor in one’s life. This uber-revolutionary development in human affairs is the inevitable consequence of mindfiles, mindware and mindclones. Our souls will now be able to outlast our bodies — not only in religion, but also on earth.

Techno-immortality need not imply an eternity of life in a box. Broadband connectivity to audio and video, and to tactile, taste and scent enabled future websites, will make life much more enjoyable than the ‘in a box’ phrase suggests. The outputs of our fingertips, taste buds and olfactory nerves are electronic signals that can be interpreted by software in the same manner as are sound waves and light signals. Nevertheless, it is hard to beat a real flesh body for mind-blowing experiences. Within a few score years for an optimist, and not more than a few centuries for a pessimist, current rates of technology development will result in replacement bodies grown outside of a womb. Such spare bodies, or “sleeves” as novelist Richard Morgan calls them , will be compatibly matched with mindclones. To make the sleeve be the same person as the mindclone either:

(a) the sleeve’s neural patterns will need to be grown ectogenetically to reflect those of the mindclone’s software patterns; or
(b) the sleeve’s naturally grown neural patterns will need to be interfaced and subordinated to a very small computer implanted in the cranium that contains a copy of the mindclone’s software.

Once these feats of neuro-technology are accomplished, techno-immortality will then also extend into the walkabout world of swimming in real water and skiing on real snow. In addition, mechanical bodies, including ones with flesh-like skin, are rapidly being developed to enable robotic help with elder care in countries like Japan (where the ratio of young to old people is getting too small). Such robot bodies will also be outfitted with mindclone minds to provide for escapes from virtual reality.

Check out the site for more of that answer and the other answers she provides. Then check to see when she answers another question.

This site rates two thumbs up from me.

Friday Videos — Greatest Song of all Time Edition

Harvey sends us this visually stunning dance remix of the classic Istanbul:

This is good, but it lacks the magic and deep meaning of the lyrics of the song.

Many years ago Harvey sent me a mix tape (sorry, kids, if you don’t know what that is — no time to explain) entitled “Tunes Harv Digs” which really needs to be recreated as an an iTunes playlist for all the world to enjoy. I rediscovered the tape some years later, when my older daughter was five or six, and she loved it, especially the They Might Be Giants cover of Istanbul.

Here’s the TMBG version, as acted out by the Tiny Toons:

Hannah and I decided that Istanbul is the greatest song of all time. It has yet to be dethroned for me — haven’t checked in with her on it lately.

However, if it has any competition at all, it comes from the epic Birdhouse in Your Soul:

If you want more TMBG, check out their TED “talk:

Their last song, Alphabet of Nations, is pretty awesome.

Shadows of What May Be

J. Storrs Hall of the Foresight Institute shares an unusually bleak scenario with the Foresight Senior Associates in his most recent e-mail:

The coming collapse

We don’t have a decision market — what Robin Hanson called “idea futures” when he invented them — in the efficacy of our government’s fiscal and monetary policies. But we have something close: the price of gold. As I write, gold is nearing $1050 an ounce, an unprecedented high. The logic of the market translates this into confidence at an unprecedented low.

Part of this caution is due to recent revelations of plans among the Arabian Gulf states, China, Russia, Japan, and others, to move out of the dollar as the oil reserve currency. Part is due to the fact that our policies of bailing out failing businesses are like of the Japanese in the 90s, which led to a “lost decade” of severely stunted economic growth. And part is because we’ve been living high by borrowing, and the rest of the world is beginning to wonder whether we’ll ever pay it back.

The problem is, that world-straddling empires don’t just have a lost decade. When the British Empire collapsed in the decade following World War II, standards of living in England went from the highest in the world — London was essentially the world’s capital as late as 1910 — to those of a third-world country. The top empire has a lot of advantages that it loses when it drops back into the pack, such as having its currency be the reserve and thus being able to print its way out of tight spots. Losing those advantages has a multiplier effect on what would otherwise be a mild, or at least not precipitous, decline.

One of the reasons the British collapsed as far as they did should give us pause. The Empire had accumulated a host of structural inefficiencies which they could get away with before, but were a huge drag on an economy trying to be competitive. We have these in spades, along with the fact that our science and engineering education, and levels of interest among young people, is dismal.

You may be surprised to hear this kind of thing from Foresight, because we usually have an optimistic take on the future. In fact, the technical outlook has never been brighter: nanotechnology, artificial intelligence, and molecular biotech are increasingly in our grasp and have, more clearly than ever, the potential to change our future drastically for the better. Matter printers, personal robot servants, and a cure for aging would give us a fantastic standard of living no matter what the rest of the world might do.

But these things will not happen by themselves. They have to be invented and built. And that means they have to be invested in. And that means people have to understand that they are possible, and in the not-too-distant future.

And that’s where Foresight comes in.

Yours sincerely,

Josh

J. Storrs Hall, Ph.D. President Foresight Institute

I think Josh has thrown down the gauntlet, not just for Foresight but for everyone who believes that a vastly better future is in our grasp, that it’s something we can achieve sooner rather than later. Is the coming collapse inevitable? I believe it is no more inevitable than the Malthusian end-state of humanity laid out by Robin Hanson that we discussed on last night’s show.

I am reminded of this passage from A Christmas Carol:

“Before I draw nearer to that stone to which you point,” said Scrooge, “answer me one question. Are these the shadows of the things that Will be, or are they shadows of things that May be, only?”

Still the Ghost pointed downward to the grave by which it stood.

“Men’s courses will foreshadow certain ends, to which, if persevered in, they must lead,” said Scrooge. “But if the courses be departed from, the ends will change. Say it is thus with what you show me!”

The Spirit was immovable as ever.

Scrooge crept towards it, trembling as he went; and following the finger, read upon the stone of the neglected grave his own name, Ebenezer Scrooge.

“Am I that man who lay upon the bed?” he cried, upon his knees.

The finger pointed from the grave to him, and back again.

“No, Spirit! Oh no, no!”

The finger still was there.

“Spirit!” he cried, tight clutching at its robe, “hear me! I am not the man I was. I will not be the man I must have been but for this intercourse. Why show me this, if I am past all hope?”

For the first time the hand appeared to shake.

“Good Spirit,” he pursued, as down upon the ground he fell before it: “Your nature intercedes for me, and pities me. Assure me that I yet may change these shadows you have shown me, by an altered life!”

A change of direction is possible, requiring first a change of heart. What will happen over the next 10, 20, 30 years depends a little on what we imagine to be possible, a little more on what we expect to happen, and a whole lot on what we insist must happen.

The choices are:

1. We experience a gradual, or even rapid, decline over that period, orchestrated and carried out by a political class composed of two parties each of which ceaselessly insists it is fighting against such a collapse, while doing little or nothing to help us realize the truly game-changing technologies that Josh described above, the ones that can turn everything around. We ultimately land in an end-state somewhat north of sheer misery (we hope), but far less than what we knew was possible.

2. We take charge of the process ourselves, either replacing the aforementioned political class with people who really get it, or bypassing them altogether. We work to bring about truly meaningful economic change by way of highly achievable technological progress. And over the next 30 years, we launch the biggest economic boom in human history, making a tiny blip out of every period of growth that has come before.

Yes, there are plenty of scenarios that fall between these two, but these are the bookends — these are the possibilities we should be looking at as we decide what steps to take next.

I think anyone who has read the book will agree: we don’t want the nightmare to become our reality. We want to wake up and have a very merry Christmas. If the courses be departed from, the ends will change.

FastForward Radio — Living in the Dream Time

On a special Wednesday edition of FastForward Radio, futurists Phil Bowermaster and Stephen Gordon explore various issues related to the future, including the future of human evolution. Recently at the Speculist we’ve been talking about whether humanity is evolving away from negative traits such as racism, but we’re also forced to confront the issue of whether we’re evolving towards negative traits such as obsessive media-driven attention-seeking.

Recent studies show that human beings are becoming more fertile. Is there a chance that increased fecundity will lead to a dumbing down of humanity as depicted in the movie Idiocracy? Taking a longer view, are we living in a mysterious dream time that comes before the true beginning of human history, and making (perhaps unfortunate) choices that will impact trillions of lives for many billions of years to come?

Tune in and discuss.

Archived recording available here:

Listen to FastForward Radio... on Blog Talk Radio





Good News. Really.

It just doesn’t sound like it at first:

AP) NEW ORLEANS A Louisiana justice of the peace said he refused to issue a marriage license to an interracial couple out of concern for any children the couple might have. Keith Bardwell, justice of the peace in Tangipahoa Parish, says it is his experience that most interracial marriages do not last long.

“I’m not a racist. I just don’t believe in mixing the races that way,” Bardwell told the Associated Press on Thursday. “I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else.”

Bardwell said he asks everyone who calls about marriage if they are a mixed race couple. If they are, he does not marry them, he said.

Bardwell said he has discussed the topic with blacks and whites, along with witnessing some interracial marriages. He came to the conclusion that most of black society does not readily accept offspring of such relationships, and neither does white society, he said.

Yes, what possible chance does the “offspring of such relationships” have of finding acceptance in American society in this day and age?

obama-wins-birmingham.jpg

Okay, fine, but not everybody gets to be president. And there’s no question that some people who come from a mixed-race background have a very difficult time of it. So I guess it’s perfectly reasonable that this guy would come to the conclusion that such people should simply therefore not exist at all. And that he should be the one making that decision.

My wife comes from a mixed-race background; my baby daughter, even more so. If people like Keith Bardwell were calling the shots, neither of them would ever have been allowed to be born.

However, I said there was good news and there is. Leave it to James Taranto to spell it out:

Bardwell’s protest that he is not a racist is laughable. Nonetheless, the inevitable hand-wringing about the persistence of racism in America is bunk. This story underscores the immense racial progress America has made.

Within living memory, this would not even have been a news story. As recently as 1967, interracial marriage was illegal in 16 states, including Louisiana. Today Bardwell, for voicing views that carried the force of law a little over 40 years ago, is viewed by almost everyone as an outrageous freak. Bardwell is just a guy with a stupid and crazy idea who decided to make a personal statement rather than do the job he was hired to do. He is not a symbol of inequality in America.

Absolutely. We are rapidly evolving away from this kind of bigoted, narrow-minded ignorance. The good news here is how utterly shocking this story is. Such attitudes simply no longer have a place in American society, thank God.

Things really are getting better all the time.

Ah, Andromeda

She’s lovely.

andromeda_1502473c.jpg

She overwhelmed us when we first saw her — literally opening up whole new universes of possibility:

Andromeda, a hop and a skip away in galactic terms at 2.5 million light years, was the first galaxy to be recognised outside the Milky Way, and the nearest spiral galaxy to our own.

Its discovery transformed our understanding of the universe. Beforehand it was thought that the mere 200 billion or so stars of the Milky Way represented the entire cosmos.

Since Andromeda was confirmed to be a separate entity, itself containing around a trillion stars, the estimate has grown to include more than 100 billion galaxies, each containing tens or hundreds of billions of stars.

And now, all these years later, we notice her again and find her to be as graceful, mysterious, and alluring as ever. Nice neighborhood we live in, isn’t it?