I’m being forced off-topic in order to make this public service announcement – please don’t buy the 2006 live action version of “Year Without a Santa Claus.” It comes out today on DVD after premiering last night on television.
It is just awful. Everything about it screams that it was done cheap. The script is terrible, the film quality looks like it was shot with a cam-corder. The actors seemed to have realized – too late to get out of it – that they had made a mistake to take the job. You can actually see their embarrassment at the lines they have to deliver. John Goodman looked ill for most of the movie – probably because it was shot here in Louisiana last July. Who’s bright idea was it to put John Goodman in a full Santa outfit and run him around downtown Natchitoches, Louisiana in 100 + degree weather? Goodman was so sweaty and flushed that I got a little concerned about his health.
It saddens me that somebody, somewhere is going to spend hard-earned money on this tripe for a child. Please, if you want to buy a Christmas DVD for a kid in your life avoid this one like the plague. Go with one of the classics:
Of course there are many versions of A Christmas Carol. It’s surprising that so many of these productions are good. Alastair Sim, George C. Scott, and Patrick Stewart have all done great work playing Ebenezer Scrooge – you can’t go wrong with any of those versions.
Some parts of Scrooge’s story are a bit intense for small kids. For them, get “The Muppet Christmas Carol.” It’s the same story, but the Muppets keep it light and funny. It wouldn’t work except that Michael Caine plays Scrooge absolutely straight. Not for one second does he let on that most of his co-stars are puppets. A truly great kid’s movie.
UPDATE: Just in case you read the title and then skipped to the last sentence… A Year Without A Santa Claus is NOT “a truly great kid’s movie.” It is absolute swill. It is perhaps the worst production I’ve seen on television this decade.