<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Astronauts</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/space/virtual-astrona.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/space/virtual-astrona.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/space/virtual-astrona.html#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2004 15:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=42#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The virtual astronaut story has this quote:&quot;HAL was a vision of artificial intelligenceâ€¦and Iâ€™m not a big fan of AI. Never have been,&quot; [Peter] Plantec said. &quot;What we really need is to fake conscious behavior so that we humans can have the emotional relationship with machines. You canâ€™t do that with AI.&quot;

Thank you! My enhanced human character, Asimov, in The Council, and my robot character, Colter, have both recoiled from the use of the term &quot;AI.&quot; I rejected the concept on an emotional and intuitive level. Peter Plantec helps me understand that there is an alternative to AI. I wouldn&#039;t term it &quot;fake&quot; conscious behavior, however. Would the term &quot;synthetic&quot; be more appropriate? A synthesis isn&#039;t merely artificial, it&#039;s a recombination of essential elements to make something new. And if it&#039;s real, it isn&#039;t &quot;fake.&quot;

Congratulations on getting The Speculist up again. We missed it!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The virtual astronaut story has this quote:&#8221;HAL was a vision of artificial intelligenceâ€¦and Iâ€™m not a big fan of AI. Never have been,&#8221; [Peter] Plantec said. &#8220;What we really need is to fake conscious behavior so that we humans can have the emotional relationship with machines. You canâ€™t do that with AI.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thank you! My enhanced human character, Asimov, in The Council, and my robot character, Colter, have both recoiled from the use of the term &#8220;AI.&#8221; I rejected the concept on an emotional and intuitive level. Peter Plantec helps me understand that there is an alternative to AI. I wouldn&#8217;t term it &#8220;fake&#8221; conscious behavior, however. Would the term &#8220;synthetic&#8221; be more appropriate? A synthesis isn&#8217;t merely artificial, it&#8217;s a recombination of essential elements to make something new. And if it&#8217;s real, it isn&#8217;t &#8220;fake.&#8221;</p>
<p>Congratulations on getting The Speculist up again. We missed it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
