<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Future Wealth Update</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/society/future-wealth-u.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/society/future-wealth-u.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdvancedAtheist</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/society/future-wealth-u.html#comment-1168</link>
		<dc:creator>AdvancedAtheist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=580#comment-1168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I appreciate your post for not dismissing this idea out of hand. I&#039;ve seen some especially hostile comments about these cryonicists on free market blogs, calling them &quot;idiots&quot; and &quot;rich suckers,&quot; for example. Ironically in other contexts free-market advocates tend to praise financially successful business people, hold them up as role models and attribute superior judgment to them. I suspect the prospect of having the money to buy your way back from death incites latent envy in some impecunious people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate your post for not dismissing this idea out of hand. I&#8217;ve seen some especially hostile comments about these cryonicists on free market blogs, calling them &#8220;idiots&#8221; and &#8220;rich suckers,&#8221; for example. Ironically in other contexts free-market advocates tend to praise financially successful business people, hold them up as role models and attribute superior judgment to them. I suspect the prospect of having the money to buy your way back from death incites latent envy in some impecunious people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/society/future-wealth-u.html#comment-1167</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=580#comment-1167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil:

Okay, here&#039;s the example I gave in a comment awhile back:



&quot;Let&#039;s say you have $2 million socked away in investments that reliably return 10% annually - that&#039;s $200,000.

Let&#039;s say your effective tax rate (state plus fed) is 50% on that interest income. Your after-tax income would be $100,000 per year.

Never touching the principal.&quot;



But you&#039;ve pointed out correctly that you would also need to take into account inflation.

Inflation has historically been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=457272&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;about 3%&lt;/a&gt;.

If inflation holds at that level, you could perpetually take the equivalent of $97,000.00 in today&#039;s dollars every year without touching the principle.

A person could make it on that.  Especially if he was healthy enough to work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil:</p>
<p>Okay, here&#8217;s the example I gave in a comment awhile back:</p>
<p>&#8220;Let&#8217;s say you have $2 million socked away in investments that reliably return 10% annually &#8211; that&#8217;s $200,000.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say your effective tax rate (state plus fed) is 50% on that interest income. Your after-tax income would be $100,000 per year.</p>
<p>Never touching the principal.&#8221;</p>
<p>But you&#8217;ve pointed out correctly that you would also need to take into account inflation.</p>
<p>Inflation has historically been <a href="http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayStory.cfm?Story_ID=457272" rel="nofollow">about 3%</a>.</p>
<p>If inflation holds at that level, you could perpetually take the equivalent of $97,000.00 in today&#8217;s dollars every year without touching the principle.</p>
<p>A person could make it on that.  Especially if he was healthy enough to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
