<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is It?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/scenarios/what-is-it.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/scenarios/what-is-it.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/scenarios/what-is-it.html#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=439#comment-846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is cool, but I&#039;d difinitely want the below-ground version.  Above ground this would definitely freak the neighbors.

&quot;No, you can&#039;t play with those Gordon kids.  Their Dad is in some Raelean cult or something.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is cool, but I&#8217;d difinitely want the below-ground version.  Above ground this would definitely freak the neighbors.</p>
<p>&#8220;No, you can&#8217;t play with those Gordon kids.  Their Dad is in some Raelean cult or something.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triticale</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/scenarios/what-is-it.html#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>triticale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 06:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=439#comment-845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My problem with it is merely aesthetic. It&#039;s too truncated pyramidy. I&#039;d like it better if it were more archy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My problem with it is merely aesthetic. It&#8217;s too truncated pyramidy. I&#8217;d like it better if it were more archy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Ferguson</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/scenarios/what-is-it.html#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 11:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=439#comment-844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From their web site:&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Since the time of the maginot line in Europe, the word bunker has been synonymous with an indestructible, fixed structure built into the ground...&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;Comparing their bunkers to the Maginot line is unfortunate, and probably also accurate. Hitler had no problem overrunning France by going around the Maginot line.&lt;p&gt;Maybe a bunker would be good hurricane protection, but would you actually want to be encased in a bunker during a civil insurrection? All the bad guys would have to do would be to wait until you eventually ran out of food and water.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From their web site:<br />
<blockquote>&#8220;Since the time of the maginot line in Europe, the word bunker has been synonymous with an indestructible, fixed structure built into the ground&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Comparing their bunkers to the Maginot line is unfortunate, and probably also accurate. Hitler had no problem overrunning France by going around the Maginot line.
<p>Maybe a bunker would be good hurricane protection, but would you actually want to be encased in a bunker during a civil insurrection? All the bad guys would have to do would be to wait until you eventually ran out of food and water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
