<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is It?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/what-is-it-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/what-is-it-1.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Hallowell</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/what-is-it-1.html#comment-2343</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hallowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1107#comment-2343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately, they don&#039;t cover engineering very well. It is interesting how dominant medical science is. A lot more papers per researcher, I think. The bizarre thing about the &quot;math&quot; section is that the buzz word chains are mostly specialized stuff from the applied math side (topics in operator theory, fluid dynamics, differential equations, etc) with one chain about antennas. Most &quot;real&quot; work doesn&#039;t show up at all.

I guess this probably shows the insularity of the field. When one outside the field thinks math, one thinks antennas? Heh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, they don&#8217;t cover engineering very well. It is interesting how dominant medical science is. A lot more papers per researcher, I think. The bizarre thing about the &#8220;math&#8221; section is that the buzz word chains are mostly specialized stuff from the applied math side (topics in operator theory, fluid dynamics, differential equations, etc) with one chain about antennas. Most &#8220;real&#8221; work doesn&#8217;t show up at all.</p>
<p>I guess this probably shows the insularity of the field. When one outside the field thinks math, one thinks antennas? Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/what-is-it-1.html#comment-2342</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:47:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1107#comment-2342</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And now on the last arm:

&quot;...parallel manipulators, flow controller, reluctance motor, unified power, and voltage stability.&quot;

Okay, got all that memorized.  Might come come in handy.

:-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now on the last arm:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;parallel manipulators, flow controller, reluctance motor, unified power, and voltage stability.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay, got all that memorized.  Might come come in handy.<br />
 <img src='https://blog.speculist.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
