<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Things We&#039;ll Never Understand</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/post-6-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/post-6-2.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/post-6-2.html#comment-9686</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1631#comment-9686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists will continue to refute Mills&#039; quantum claims, offering alternative explanations as to how his fuel cells produce power, and explaining that we need to better understand how they operate better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists will continue to refute Mills&#8217; quantum claims, offering alternative explanations as to how his fuel cells produce power, and explaining that we need to better understand how they operate better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/post-6-2.html#comment-9685</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1631#comment-9685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s possible that Randall Mills is onto something but that he&#039;s completely wrong about why it works.

It wouldn&#039;t be the first time we exploited something we didn&#039;t understand.  We used aspirin for many years before it was understood.

Glass has been used for 5,000 years and its still &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/science/29glass.html?_r=2&amp;partner=rssyahoo&amp;emc=rss&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not really understood&lt;/a&gt;.

But we never give up trying to understand.  &quot;Something we may never understand&quot; is a stupid philosophy - particularly for a science teacher.  It was just lazy storytelling on Shyamalan&#039;s part.

Oh, and its also quite possible that this BlackLight thing is just a big fat hoax.  But I hope not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible that Randall Mills is onto something but that he&#8217;s completely wrong about why it works.</p>
<p>It wouldn&#8217;t be the first time we exploited something we didn&#8217;t understand.  We used aspirin for many years before it was understood.</p>
<p>Glass has been used for 5,000 years and its still <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/29/science/29glass.html?_r=2&#038;partner=rssyahoo&#038;emc=rss&#038;oref=slogin&#038;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">not really understood</a>.</p>
<p>But we never give up trying to understand.  &#8220;Something we may never understand&#8221; is a stupid philosophy &#8211; particularly for a science teacher.  It was just lazy storytelling on Shyamalan&#8217;s part.</p>
<p>Oh, and its also quite possible that this BlackLight thing is just a big fat hoax.  But I hope not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chad</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/philosophy/post-6-2.html#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 18:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1631#comment-9684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Physicists like that drive me nuts.  Astrophysics and quantum physics are so theoretical, and yet, they treat these theories like fact.  Like world-is-flat fact.
But it really is theory, in fact it&#039;s theory built on theory built on theory built on theory.  They start treating all these theories as fact to create new layers of theories.  I hope Mills knocks down their house of cards.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Physicists like that drive me nuts.  Astrophysics and quantum physics are so theoretical, and yet, they treat these theories like fact.  Like world-is-flat fact.<br />
But it really is theory, in fact it&#8217;s theory built on theory built on theory built on theory.  They start treating all these theories as fact to create new layers of theories.  I hope Mills knocks down their house of cards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
