<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#039;m Not Sure How to Classify This</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/paranormal/im-not-sure-how-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/paranormal/im-not-sure-how-2.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Morem</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/paranormal/im-not-sure-how-2.html#comment-9811</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Morem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1841#comment-9811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t sure where to post this, so I decided to post it here, on your latest item:

Really cool future astronomy

ï¿½Located 9,200 feet above sea level, atop the Apache Point Observatory in Sunspot, New Mexico, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey telescope cannot match the incredibly sharp vision of the Hubble Space Telescope, which orbits above Earthï¿½s blurring atmosphere. And, at a modest 2.5 meters (8 feet) across, the Sloan telescopeï¿½s main mirror cannot see the incredibly dim objects that the 10-meter (33-foot) Keck telescopes in Hawaii can. What the Sloan telescope does have in spades is a voracious appetite for skyï¿½an appetite that is producing some of the most amazing discoveries in astronomy.

ï¿½With its giant set of light-sensitive imaging sensors, the Sloan telescope has a field of view so wide it can image 36 full moonsï¿½ worth of sky at once (Hubble, in contrast, is limited to a view less than one-tenth of a moon across). Night after night it scans vast swaths of the heavens and downloads its observations into a 73-terabyte (and growing) digital database that covers almost half the night sky as seen from Apache Point. Swept up in the Sloanï¿½s relentless gaze are stars, galaxies, supernovas, nebulas, and moreï¿½over 350 million celestial objects in totalï¿½adding up to the most complete census of the universe ever conducted.ï¿½


http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/06-world.s-hardest-working-telescope

Can you imagine how cool it would be to have an advanced version of this telescope sweeping the skies while in Earth orbit, like the Hubble.  Even better, if the aperture was much MUCH larger.  Even better than that, built out of nanobots and run by AI software.   Oooooooo!

All the things we could know.  All the places we could see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t sure where to post this, so I decided to post it here, on your latest item:</p>
<p>Really cool future astronomy</p>
<p>ï¿½Located 9,200 feet above sea level, atop the Apache Point Observatory in Sunspot, New Mexico, the Sloan Digital Sky Survey telescope cannot match the incredibly sharp vision of the Hubble Space Telescope, which orbits above Earthï¿½s blurring atmosphere. And, at a modest 2.5 meters (8 feet) across, the Sloan telescopeï¿½s main mirror cannot see the incredibly dim objects that the 10-meter (33-foot) Keck telescopes in Hawaii can. What the Sloan telescope does have in spades is a voracious appetite for skyï¿½an appetite that is producing some of the most amazing discoveries in astronomy.</p>
<p>ï¿½With its giant set of light-sensitive imaging sensors, the Sloan telescope has a field of view so wide it can image 36 full moonsï¿½ worth of sky at once (Hubble, in contrast, is limited to a view less than one-tenth of a moon across). Night after night it scans vast swaths of the heavens and downloads its observations into a 73-terabyte (and growing) digital database that covers almost half the night sky as seen from Apache Point. Swept up in the Sloanï¿½s relentless gaze are stars, galaxies, supernovas, nebulas, and moreï¿½over 350 million celestial objects in totalï¿½adding up to the most complete census of the universe ever conducted.ï¿½</p>
<p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/06-world.s-hardest-working-telescope" rel="nofollow">http://discovermagazine.com/2009/mar/06-world.s-hardest-working-telescope</a></p>
<p>Can you imagine how cool it would be to have an advanced version of this telescope sweeping the skies while in Earth orbit, like the Hubble.  Even better, if the aperture was much MUCH larger.  Even better than that, built out of nanobots and run by AI software.   Oooooooo!</p>
<p>All the things we could know.  All the places we could see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeD</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/paranormal/im-not-sure-how-2.html#comment-9810</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 20:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1841#comment-9810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From there to this:
http://cbs13.com/video?id=29977

cool &amp; scary tech

I wonder if it&#039;s defeated by sunglasses?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From there to this:<br />
<a href="http://cbs13.com/video?id=29977" rel="nofollow">http://cbs13.com/video?id=29977</a></p>
<p>cool &#038; scary tech</p>
<p>I wonder if it&#8217;s defeated by sunglasses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
