Comments on: Dork of The Year Award https://blog.speculist.com/nanotechnology/dork-of-the-yea.html Live to see it. Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1 By: Phil Bowermaster https://blog.speculist.com/nanotechnology/dork-of-the-yea.html#comment-127 Phil Bowermaster Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:25:42 +0000 http://localhost/specblog/?p=114#comment-127 Well, to be really technical, that picture was taken in 1985. I hardly see how it could qualify me for Dork of the Year 2004. Sadly, I am now (to use a phrase that attracted a certain amount of attention in the past) marginally less dorky.

]]> By: Kathy https://blog.speculist.com/nanotechnology/dork-of-the-yea.html#comment-126 Kathy Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:39:21 +0000 http://localhost/specblog/?p=114#comment-126 Beware, Shocking Photo

]]> By: Kathy https://blog.speculist.com/nanotechnology/dork-of-the-yea.html#comment-125 Kathy Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:38:03 +0000 http://localhost/specblog/?p=114#comment-125 Maybe I should post it again….to be fair to Phil, however– or to give him an advantage (depending on your perspective), I should confess that I cut out the other dorks in that picture…self included.

]]> By: Stephen Gordon https://blog.speculist.com/nanotechnology/dork-of-the-yea.html#comment-124 Stephen Gordon Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:52:14 +0000 http://localhost/specblog/?p=114#comment-124 Phil:

They’ve OBVIOUSLY never seen that picture with the Mickey Mouse ears. :-)

]]>