<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Third on my List</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: triticale</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>triticale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 11:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=703#comment-1466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, but this thing isn&#039;t lighter than air. It is heavier than air, but lighter than an airplane of equal capacity. Bouyancy assisted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but this thing isn&#8217;t lighter than air. It is heavier than air, but lighter than an airplane of equal capacity. Bouyancy assisted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby928</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html#comment-1465</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby928</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 08:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=703#comment-1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as I would like airships to be practical, it does not appear to be possible.  Any airship large enough to perform meaningful work seems to invariably  crash due to weather.  The sheer size and light mass makes them prisoners of the wind.  The idea of stratospheric, permanent airships does seem practible however.  I remember reading in Joe Haldeman&#039;s SciFi book, &#039;The Forever War&#039;, about stratospheric nuclear powered hot air airships and was captivated by the idea.  Above the weather and permanently powered.  Cool idea.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would like airships to be practical, it does not appear to be possible.  Any airship large enough to perform meaningful work seems to invariably  crash due to weather.  The sheer size and light mass makes them prisoners of the wind.  The idea of stratospheric, permanent airships does seem practible however.  I remember reading in Joe Haldeman&#8217;s SciFi book, &#8216;The Forever War&#8217;, about stratospheric nuclear powered hot air airships and was captivated by the idea.  Above the weather and permanently powered.  Cool idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Anissimov</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Anissimov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 01:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=703#comment-1464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Airships are fun to obsess over.  See also &lt;a href=&quot;http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/resort-hotels-of-stratospheric-future.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2006/01/lockheed-wins-1492m-contract-for-high-altitude-airship-updated/index.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Airships are fun to obsess over.  See also <a href="http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2006/03/resort-hotels-of-stratospheric-future.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> and <a href="http://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/2006/01/lockheed-wins-1492m-contract-for-high-altitude-airship-updated/index.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=703#comment-1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the article:

&quot;the Aeroscraft&#039;s size: 165 feet high, 244 feet wide and 647 feet long. That&#039;s about as long as two football fields. It will carry up to 400 tons of cargo over a range of 6,000 miles. With a top speed of 174 mph, it will be able to cross the U.S. in about 18 hours.&quot;

This ship won&#039;t put a dent in business travel, but  if you&#039;re traveling for pleasure, it would be nice to make &quot;getting there&quot; part of the fun.

Something with this kind of space could have shopping, a casino, dining area, entertainment, and private staterooms.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;the Aeroscraft&#8217;s size: 165 feet high, 244 feet wide and 647 feet long. That&#8217;s about as long as two football fields. It will carry up to 400 tons of cargo over a range of 6,000 miles. With a top speed of 174 mph, it will be able to cross the U.S. in about 18 hours.&#8221;</p>
<p>This ship won&#8217;t put a dent in business travel, but  if you&#8217;re traveling for pleasure, it would be nice to make &#8220;getting there&#8221; part of the fun.</p>
<p>Something with this kind of space could have shopping, a casino, dining area, entertainment, and private staterooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eisendorn</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/inventions/third-on-my-lis-1.html#comment-1462</link>
		<dc:creator>eisendorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 08:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=703#comment-1462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this reminds me of the cargolifter project. i wonder if the technical complexity of this thing is low enough as compared to the cargolifter for it to actually ever see production ...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this reminds me of the cargolifter project. i wonder if the technical complexity of this thing is low enough as compared to the cargolifter for it to actually ever see production &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
