<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stem Cell Therapy &#8212; a New Approach</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/my-little-bud-g.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/my-little-bud-g.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Munro</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/my-little-bud-g.html#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=166#comment-199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

This is rather an interesting story. If it really is true, the potential market would be huge, the political obstacles zero, the risk modest, and the near-term RoI large compared ot the ESC-investment. But there&#039;s surprisingly little interest by industry, universities or media. Perhaps there&#039;s something wrong with the science? Or maybe it is the IP? (Can adult stem-cell products be as well protected by IP as patented drugs are protected?) Or perhaps it is something about the culture of science and media that isn&#039;t quite understood. I&#039;d love to know. 
Neil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is rather an interesting story. If it really is true, the potential market would be huge, the political obstacles zero, the risk modest, and the near-term RoI large compared ot the ESC-investment. But there&#8217;s surprisingly little interest by industry, universities or media. Perhaps there&#8217;s something wrong with the science? Or maybe it is the IP? (Can adult stem-cell products be as well protected by IP as patented drugs are protected?) Or perhaps it is something about the culture of science and media that isn&#8217;t quite understood. I&#8217;d love to know.<br />
Neil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
