<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Good Stem Cell News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=169#comment-205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Phil:

I&#039;m not sure whether that would be acceptible or not.  There&#039;s no new conception.  But, we&#039;d still be playing in God&#039;s toybox.

In his book &quot;The Immortal Cell,&quot; Michael West spoke of experiments where he did exactly what you are talking about - and faced much criticism for it.

The dream solution would be to find a source of polypotent stem cells that:

1. Didn&#039;t involve the destruction of a potential human.

2. Doesn&#039;t involve the use of tissue that is painful to extract (harvesting human eggs is very painful).

3. Is readily available within the body of any given patient.

4. Is inexpensive

An inexpensive method for taken differentiated cells back to stem cell status would fit the bill nicely.

The doctor rubs a swab on the inside of the patient&#039;s mouth.  The cells are run through a process and viola! The patient has his own stem cell line. 

Well, we can dream.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether that would be acceptible or not.  There&#8217;s no new conception.  But, we&#8217;d still be playing in God&#8217;s toybox.</p>
<p>In his book &#8220;The Immortal Cell,&#8221; Michael West spoke of experiments where he did exactly what you are talking about &#8211; and faced much criticism for it.</p>
<p>The dream solution would be to find a source of polypotent stem cells that:</p>
<p>1. Didn&#8217;t involve the destruction of a potential human.</p>
<p>2. Doesn&#8217;t involve the use of tissue that is painful to extract (harvesting human eggs is very painful).</p>
<p>3. Is readily available within the body of any given patient.</p>
<p>4. Is inexpensive</p>
<p>An inexpensive method for taken differentiated cells back to stem cell status would fit the bill nicely.</p>
<p>The doctor rubs a swab on the inside of the patient&#8217;s mouth.  The cells are run through a process and viola! The patient has his own stem cell line. </p>
<p>Well, we can dream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=169#comment-204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What if you took an egg, stripped out its DNA and put in a donor&#039;s DNA and then used this method to get the egg to multiply? You would then have stem cells that were an exact genetic match for the donor.

Would this method of therapuetic cloning be acceptable to pro-lifers? (Actually, I&#039;m not entirely sure how or why it would be different from other techniques that might be used to create a human clone.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if you took an egg, stripped out its DNA and put in a donor&#8217;s DNA and then used this method to get the egg to multiply? You would then have stem cells that were an exact genetic match for the donor.</p>
<p>Would this method of therapuetic cloning be acceptable to pro-lifers? (Actually, I&#8217;m not entirely sure how or why it would be different from other techniques that might be used to create a human clone.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=169#comment-203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d guess that these egg-only stem cells would be
especially useful to the woman from which the egg was extracted.  If this was going to be our sole source of polypotent stem cells (which isn&#039;t likely) males, girls, and post-menopausal women would have to depend on a close match.  

Perhaps a similar trick could be used to extract
polypotent stem cells from male gametes.  If this were possible, it would be a great development because of the ease obtaining these gametes, and their vast number.

Also, I wonder if stem cells obtained from eggs could be used at all in males - no Y chromosome.

Of course we learned that women who have male babies have XY stem cells in their bodies, so maybe its not a problem.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d guess that these egg-only stem cells would be<br />
especially useful to the woman from which the egg was extracted.  If this was going to be our sole source of polypotent stem cells (which isn&#8217;t likely) males, girls, and post-menopausal women would have to depend on a close match.  </p>
<p>Perhaps a similar trick could be used to extract<br />
polypotent stem cells from male gametes.  If this were possible, it would be a great development because of the ease obtaining these gametes, and their vast number.</p>
<p>Also, I wonder if stem cells obtained from eggs could be used at all in males &#8211; no Y chromosome.</p>
<p>Of course we learned that women who have male babies have XY stem cells in their bodies, so maybe its not a problem.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=169#comment-202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/healthmedicine/more-good-stem.html#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 08:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=169#comment-201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Test]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
