<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Get the Future Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/future/why-we-get-the.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/future/why-we-get-the.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harvey</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/future/why-we-get-the.html#comment-4371</link>
		<dc:creator>Harvey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1845#comment-4371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this.  I watched the entire video, and suspect I am now better prepared for speculating and decision making.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.  I watched the entire video, and suspect I am now better prepared for speculating and decision making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDarling</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/future/why-we-get-the.html#comment-4370</link>
		<dc:creator>MDarling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1845#comment-4370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[also- like th part about how to value
(probability of occurance) * (value of that occurance) = expected value

Think about it in terms of longevity.  If I expect to live to 80 yrs old, I may treat risk now at 40-something one way. The value of the less than 40years being one thing.

But since I expect to live to 150yrs old - I treat risk very differently. I got 100 years + to go and the value of that is clearly different than 40 years to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also- like th part about how to value<br />
(probability of occurance) * (value of that occurance) = expected value</p>
<p>Think about it in terms of longevity.  If I expect to live to 80 yrs old, I may treat risk now at 40-something one way. The value of the less than 40years being one thing.</p>
<p>But since I expect to live to 150yrs old &#8211; I treat risk very differently. I got 100 years + to go and the value of that is clearly different than 40 years to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDarling</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/future/why-we-get-the.html#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>MDarling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1845#comment-4369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I especially like the part about error in vale because we compare to the past not the future.

And, of course, the last Q in the Q&amp; A at the end.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I especially like the part about error in vale because we compare to the past not the future.</p>
<p>And, of course, the last Q in the Q&#038; A at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
