Comments on: Friday Videos — Sentient Developments Piracy Edition

By: GaMongrel

GaMongrel — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 07:24:20 +0000

i’d come across this theory somewhere else the past decade and found it quite satisfactory. Will be interesting to see how the scientific community evolves as this information is used/ignored…

By: Nicole Tedesco

Nicole Tedesco — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:05:34 +0000

IMHO: Elaine Morgan’s “synthesis” of “savanna” beginnings of humanity and “aquatic” beginnings could be that we evolved to travel ACROSS savannas in order to find the next fishing hole…. We probably exhausted said fishing holes then felt compelled to move on. Perhaps our capability to exhaust one environment after another may be the very thing that pushed us to evolve.

By: Sally Morem

Sally Morem — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:49:05 +0000

I read Morgan’s “Aquatic Ape” and was impressed by the arguments therein.

First, we are relatively hairless.

Second, as Stephen described it well, our bodies are built for swimming.

Third, seafood is loaded with “brain food,” omega 3 fatty acids. I don’t buy for a minute the idea that our ancestors’ brains were rapidly growing over generations of life on the dry and dusty African savanna.

It’s much easier envisioning our ancestors living on seacoasts and estuaries, fishing, cracking open clams, and gobbling up all that nutritious seafood generation after generation.

By: Harvey

Harvey — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:32:52 +0000

The pollens don’t match! The only option, other than the 2001 monolith, would be the aquatic ape theory. The damn barnacles make the fossil evidence impossible.

By: Stephen Gordon

Stephen Gordon — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:10:50 +0000

I buy Elaine Morgan’s arguments: we’re bare, we’re streamlined for the water, we’re bipedal (like apes are when the wade in the water), we have voluntary breath control, and we have external fat deposits.