<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Self-Directed Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/evolution/selfdirected-ev.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/evolution/selfdirected-ev.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/evolution/selfdirected-ev.html#comment-4642</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1923#comment-4642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of my videos is entitled &quot;Self-Directed Evolution&quot;.  The &quot;self designed evolution&quot; term for cultural evolution sucks.  Dawkins uses &quot;Deliberate Darwinism&quot; -which is a little better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my videos is entitled &#8220;Self-Directed Evolution&#8221;.  The &#8220;self designed evolution&#8221; term for cultural evolution sucks.  Dawkins uses &#8220;Deliberate Darwinism&#8221; -which is a little better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/evolution/selfdirected-ev.html#comment-4641</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 08:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1923#comment-4641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suppose I could have said &quot;arguably the greatest&quot;  or &quot;most famous.&quot; Labeling someone the &quot;greatest&quot; scientist in the world is just about as subjective as calling him or her the &quot;nicest&quot; or &quot;best-looking&quot; scientist in the world. The work is what matters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I could have said &#8220;arguably the greatest&#8221;  or &#8220;most famous.&#8221; Labeling someone the &#8220;greatest&#8221; scientist in the world is just about as subjective as calling him or her the &#8220;nicest&#8221; or &#8220;best-looking&#8221; scientist in the world. The work is what matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/evolution/selfdirected-ev.html#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1923#comment-4640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Hawking the &#039;greatest scientist of our time?&#039;

Disappointing to see something like that on this blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Hawking the &#8216;greatest scientist of our time?&#8217;</p>
<p>Disappointing to see something like that on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
