<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bigger Than Oil</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/energy/bigger-than-oil.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/energy/bigger-than-oil.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Goodmind</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/energy/bigger-than-oil.html#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>Goodmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 10:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=298#comment-8674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We agree that hydrogen is a great source of sustainable energy with low environmental impact.  However, we also think that, while we&#039;re waiting for a hydrogen economy, there are many other renewable energy resources that are already in use and could be used further.  See our post about it at: http://goodmind.typepad.com/goodblog/2005/05/the_half_kaczyn.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We agree that hydrogen is a great source of sustainable energy with low environmental impact.  However, we also think that, while we&#8217;re waiting for a hydrogen economy, there are many other renewable energy resources that are already in use and could be used further.  See our post about it at: <a href="http://goodmind.typepad.com/goodblog/2005/05/the_half_kaczyn.html" rel="nofollow">http://goodmind.typepad.com/goodblog/2005/05/the_half_kaczyn.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/energy/bigger-than-oil.html#comment-8673</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 10:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=298#comment-8673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tricky part about the hydrogen economy is that it has to run on something. You need a source of power to extract hydrogen from water. Nuclear seems like a good bet. Not only would it provide the means of producing hydrogen to power our cars, it would, as Glenn Reynolds recently pointed out, provide a non-CO2-emitting means of powering and heating our cities.

Plus, once we&#039;re really up and running with nuclear, the transition from uranium to helium 3 should be resonably straightforward (after we get back to the moon and figure out to make fuel out of the stuff).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tricky part about the hydrogen economy is that it has to run on something. You need a source of power to extract hydrogen from water. Nuclear seems like a good bet. Not only would it provide the means of producing hydrogen to power our cars, it would, as Glenn Reynolds recently pointed out, provide a non-CO2-emitting means of powering and heating our cities.</p>
<p>Plus, once we&#8217;re really up and running with nuclear, the transition from uranium to helium 3 should be resonably straightforward (after we get back to the moon and figure out to make fuel out of the stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
