<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Cup of Joe and a Pot of  Good News</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/economics/a-cup-of-joe-an.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/economics/a-cup-of-joe-an.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Hallowell</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/economics/a-cup-of-joe-an.html#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Hallowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=951#comment-1972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the amazing things about today&#039;s economic growth is that it&#039;s *per capita*. I think the podcast puts that into perspective. Another point is consider what happened between 1 AD and 1650 AD. Economically, not much. There were interesting things developed over this time, for example, universities, ocean-ready sailing ships and the resulting global trade routes, but it&#039;s interesting how even then, most such progress was in the last few centuries.

My take is that there were a series of disasters, some perhaps not recognized as such. While the Bubonic Plague, Mongolian invasions, or the fall of the Roman Empire were rightfully recognized as disasters, I think also that many of the political systems of the day, eg, the Roman and Byzantium Empires, the Roman Catholic Church of the Middle Ages, and the Ming Dynasty helped contribute to the stagnacy of that era.

This is why I consider stagnation or collapse to be one of the key threats to human civilization. Even now, everyone knows generally what sorts of technologies and systems work. But too many parts of the world still use systems that devalue human labor and ingenuity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the amazing things about today&#8217;s economic growth is that it&#8217;s *per capita*. I think the podcast puts that into perspective. Another point is consider what happened between 1 AD and 1650 AD. Economically, not much. There were interesting things developed over this time, for example, universities, ocean-ready sailing ships and the resulting global trade routes, but it&#8217;s interesting how even then, most such progress was in the last few centuries.</p>
<p>My take is that there were a series of disasters, some perhaps not recognized as such. While the Bubonic Plague, Mongolian invasions, or the fall of the Roman Empire were rightfully recognized as disasters, I think also that many of the political systems of the day, eg, the Roman and Byzantium Empires, the Roman Catholic Church of the Middle Ages, and the Ming Dynasty helped contribute to the stagnacy of that era.</p>
<p>This is why I consider stagnation or collapse to be one of the key threats to human civilization. Even now, everyone knows generally what sorts of technologies and systems work. But too many parts of the world still use systems that devalue human labor and ingenuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
