<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Accessibility v. Security</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rapidsslonline</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html#comment-9117</link>
		<dc:creator>rapidsslonline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1011#comment-9117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes...cloud computing is slowly making its way into the market and google wants to dominate this field too. I just want to mention here one thing that was discussed with my clients recently - the main concern of security is actually very deep and there seems to be no available solution to it. A server in which a &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rapidsslonline.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; cheap ssl certificate&lt;/a&gt; is installed will be targeted by most of the hackers and they can actually retrieve any data from it. Even a server in which high brand &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.rapidsslonline.com/verisign-secure-site-pro-with-ev-sgc.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; secure site ev&lt;/a&gt; was installed was hacked by our specialist. So, this issue has to be tackled before cloud computing can actually make its way into the masses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;cloud computing is slowly making its way into the market and google wants to dominate this field too. I just want to mention here one thing that was discussed with my clients recently &#8211; the main concern of security is actually very deep and there seems to be no available solution to it. A server in which a <a href="https://www.rapidsslonline.com" rel="nofollow"> cheap ssl certificate</a> is installed will be targeted by most of the hackers and they can actually retrieve any data from it. Even a server in which high brand <a href="https://www.rapidsslonline.com/verisign-secure-site-pro-with-ev-sgc.aspx" rel="nofollow"> secure site ev</a> was installed was hacked by our specialist. So, this issue has to be tackled before cloud computing can actually make its way into the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Strickland</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html#comment-9116</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Strickland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1011#comment-9116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that security will be such a problem that the better solution will be to carry your data and your computer with you, in a small, easily portable form factor.  The user interface for the computer is the only part that need be on your desk.

Imagine computing where the hardware can be tailored to the software, if need be (see video editing.)  Imagine each application not interacting with anything else, save through a well defined network API.

Imagine, most of all, being able to use the computer at home, the computer at work, the ones in an internet cafe, etc etc., slide your computing key in, and pick up where you left off before you got on that plane, and that the contents of that key are roughly as secure as your wallet for the whole time you&#039;re not working on them.

I think less and less high value data will be accessible over the public net, unless security improves drastically, and what I&#039;ve suggested above is what I think will evolve in such an environment.

-Jim]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that security will be such a problem that the better solution will be to carry your data and your computer with you, in a small, easily portable form factor.  The user interface for the computer is the only part that need be on your desk.</p>
<p>Imagine computing where the hardware can be tailored to the software, if need be (see video editing.)  Imagine each application not interacting with anything else, save through a well defined network API.</p>
<p>Imagine, most of all, being able to use the computer at home, the computer at work, the ones in an internet cafe, etc etc., slide your computing key in, and pick up where you left off before you got on that plane, and that the contents of that key are roughly as secure as your wallet for the whole time you&#8217;re not working on them.</p>
<p>I think less and less high value data will be accessible over the public net, unless security improves drastically, and what I&#8217;ve suggested above is what I think will evolve in such an environment.</p>
<p>-Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html#comment-9115</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1011#comment-9115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew:

It&#039;s true that some form of &quot;data cloud&quot; has been around for awhile.  I think the distinction is whether the move from computer to computer is seamless.

The goal is to eliminate setup time on the new machine - you don&#039;t even have to tell the machine to download.  You just login and you&#039;re immediately in the virtual machine that follows you from device to device.

Your desktop looks the same, your files are arrange the same, etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that some form of &#8220;data cloud&#8221; has been around for awhile.  I think the distinction is whether the move from computer to computer is seamless.</p>
<p>The goal is to eliminate setup time on the new machine &#8211; you don&#8217;t even have to tell the machine to download.  You just login and you&#8217;re immediately in the virtual machine that follows you from device to device.</p>
<p>Your desktop looks the same, your files are arrange the same, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndrewS</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/computers/accessibility-v.html#comment-9114</link>
		<dc:creator>AndrewS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1011#comment-9114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt; What if every one of your files, from skimpy documents to gigabyte-hogging music collections, were accessible from any Internet connection.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, what a concept! Oh, wait. I&#039;ve been able to do that ever since I got a broadband internet connection. I use SSH, but any type of VPN should let you access all of your files with at least decent security, and the best part is, all of your data remains at home (or work) on your own machine, not some distant corporation&#039;s servers.

Snarkiness aside, I can&#039;t see why I would ever trust someone else to handle my data when it&#039;s easy enough to do myself. There are certainly aspects of it that should be easier to setup and manage than is currently the case, but fixing those problems seems better than the alternatives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p> What if every one of your files, from skimpy documents to gigabyte-hogging music collections, were accessible from any Internet connection.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, what a concept! Oh, wait. I&#8217;ve been able to do that ever since I got a broadband internet connection. I use SSH, but any type of VPN should let you access all of your files with at least decent security, and the best part is, all of your data remains at home (or work) on your own machine, not some distant corporation&#8217;s servers.</p>
<p>Snarkiness aside, I can&#8217;t see why I would ever trust someone else to handle my data when it&#8217;s easy enough to do myself. There are certainly aspects of it that should be easier to setup and manage than is currently the case, but fixing those problems seems better than the alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
