<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Speculist &#187; Past Futures</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/category/past-futures/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the Kindle&#8230;</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/past-futures/meet-the-kindle.html</link>
		<comments>https://blog.speculist.com/past-futures/meet-the-kindle.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Past Futures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.speculist.com/?p=3393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;or Nook, as pictured in 1935. More details here. Well, they certainly went to a lot of trouble. It&#8217;s too bad they attempted only to capture the book-reading capability. Imagine what a 1935-version of a Kindle Fire would look like &#8212; even a scaled-down one that could simply show movies and play music in addition [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;or Nook, as pictured in 1935.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-3394" title="1935kindle" src="https://blog.speculist.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/1935kindle.jpg" alt="" width="520" height="414" /></p>
<p>More details <a href="http://holykaw.alltop.com/book-readers-of-the-future-as-predicted-in-19">here</a>.</p>
<p>Well, they certainly went to a lot of trouble. It&#8217;s too bad they attempted only to capture the book-reading capability. Imagine what a 1935-version of a Kindle Fire would look like &#8212; even a scaled-down one that could simply show movies and play music in addition to enabling you to read books. The thing would have taken up a whole room. (Or possibly house.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.speculist.com/past-futures/meet-the-kindle.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
