<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Speculist &#187; Lifeboat</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/category/lifeboat/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 23:07:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cornerstone for Lunar Colonization and Commercial Development</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/cornerstone-for.html</link>
		<comments>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/cornerstone-for.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:05:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifeboat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As late as the early 21st century there has yet to be found a compelling reason to go to and maintain a continuous human enterprise on the Moon. This discussion presents a potentially novel, lofty and commercially interesting initial rationale for lunar development. An often overlooked asset of the Moon is its unique environmental conditions. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
As late as the early 21st century there has yet to be found a compelling reason to go to and maintain a continuous human enterprise on the Moon. This discussion presents a potentially novel, lofty and commercially interesting initial rationale for lunar development. </p>
<p>An often overlooked asset of the Moon is its unique environmental conditions. Low G is well known, but less often considered is its potential for free and continuous extreme cold.</p>
<p>There are a few dozen craters at the lunar poles where the sun NEVER shines. A cryonics station can be constructed in one or several of these craters. To what end? To build an Ark to cryogenically preserve Earth&#8217;s biosphere and to serve as the cornerstone of lunar commercialization. </p>
<p>Cornerstone would be the &#8220;Noah&#8217;s Ark&#8221; of Earth&#8217;s biosphere an off planet &#8221; Ark&#8221; to ensure cryonic preservation of all of earth&#8217;s living species  &#8211; automated to detect ELE (extinction level event) with automated systems to start the countdown to send the ark back to Earth â€“ and deploy and animate/activate its payload. The Cornerstone installation and the Ark would be constructed robotically/teleoperatively. The Cornerstone project and its Ark would be marketed as the backup of the geobiome&#8230;i.e. &#8220;COOP Earth&#8221; or COPE (COntinuity Of Planet Earth) to various international and US budget influencers such as the green community, politirk to cryogenically preserve Earth&#8217;s biosphere and to serve as the cornerstone of lunar commercialization. </p>
<p>Key points:</p>
<p>Free &#8211; uninterrupted &#8211; unending cold at < 90 degrees Kelvin </p>
<p>Zero melting risk from power outage </p>
<p>Mountain sized solar wind/radiation blocker for 360 degrees of horizon </p>
<p>Solar panels can be erected around the perimeter of the crater for perpetual energy in situ </p>
<p>Lunar water at the poles can be thawed and catalyzed to produce hydrogen and oxygen â€“ propulsion and electricity, materials etc. </p>
<p>1/6th Gravity avoids tissue drift and mechanical stresses on equipment for near geologic periods of time </p>
<p>Ark could operate reliably without human intervention for centuries </p>
<p>Absence of oxygen eliminates tendency for oxygen to become enriched in liquid nitrogen, (concern has been expressed that high concentrations of liquid oxygen -- way, way more than in the atmosphere, since liquid is 1000 times denser than air and the % of liquid oxygen could be higher than the % of oxygen in air, might react with biological samples over extended periods of time </p>
<p>No need for expensive and unreliable dewars </p>
<p>No issues from weather, rust, mold and mildew, insects, bacteria, etc </p>
<p>Low gravity environment eases relaunch of the whole package if and after there has been some decades of terrestrial silence (ELE happened) </p>
<p>When combined with Helium 3 mining, these just might be sufficient to get us there and finally make Heinlein rest easy. <a href="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/000193.html">https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/000193.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/cornerstone-for.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Nominate Glenn Reynolds</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/i-nominate-glen.html</link>
		<comments>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/i-nominate-glen.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifeboat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean, he&#8217;s the perfect amalgam of Warren Buffet, Ray Kurzweil, and Bill Joy. But he also has a certain timeless, heroic quality putting us in mind of the great ones who have come before. If anybody is going to save the planet, it&#8217;s him. Plus, in the movie, Angelina Jolie could play Dr. Helen. [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, he&#8217;s the perfect amalgam of <a href="http://lifeboat.com/ex/openings">Warren Buffet, Ray Kurzweil, and Bill Joy</a>. But he also has a certain timeless, heroic quality putting us in mind of the <a href="http://www.nndb.com/people/240/000024168/">great ones</a> who have come before. If anybody is going to save the planet, it&#8217;s him. </p>
<p>Plus,  in the movie, Angelina Jolie could play Dr. Helen.</p>
<p><center> <img alt="AngieDrH.jpg" src="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/AngieDrH.jpg" width="300" height="178" /> </center></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if they&#8217;re taking nominations, but  Glenn is definitely the guy.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;m not just anybody  saying this. I was offered a slot on the Lifeboat Foundation&#8217;s Scientific Advisory Board. That&#8217;s right. Offered. Unfortunately, I never got around to sending them a bio. Still, you know&#8230;that&#8217;s something.</p>
<p>BTW, while you&#8217;re at the <a href="http://lifeboat.com">Lifeboat Foundation</a> site, stick around a while. Read some of the stuff. This is an important outfit. Oh, and don&#8217;t forget to drop Glenn a line and let him know he&#8217;s the guy.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Hey, an Instalanche! Okay, Chief, here&#8217;s an update on casting the movie, per your specs:</p>
<p><center> <img alt="AndieDrH.jpg" src="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/AndieDrH.jpg" width="300" height="178" /> </center></p>
<p>And if anyone was wondering about who to put in the other role, I have it narrowed down to three likely candidates:</p>
<p><center> <img alt="burtKeLa.jpg" src="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/burtKeLa.jpg" width="413" height="184" /> </center></p>
<p>SECOND UPDATE: Dr. Helen herself has chimed in with a casting choice. That&#8217;s Chris Noth, Mr. Big from <em>Sex and the City</em>. Judge for yourselves&#8230;</p>
<p><center> <img alt="GlCh.jpg" src="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/GlCh.jpg" width="353" height="175" /> </center></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.speculist.com/lifeboat/i-nominate-glen.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
