<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#039;s Thinking</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/brain/its-thinking-1-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/brain/its-thinking-1-2.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDarling</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/brain/its-thinking-1-2.html#comment-9213</link>
		<dc:creator>MDarling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1129#comment-9213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Spontaneously.&quot;

What exactly started happening spontaneously?  If I get the article- they netoworked a bucket of cpu&#039;s- where each microprocessor stood in for a neuron and then put power into the net. And something happened which was characterized as spontaneous. What happened?

Not speech or word formation, I know. But did the chips do something they weren&#039;t programmed to do? And if so- was it something that couldn&#039;t be characterized as emergent (as defined by Kevin Kelley in &quot;Wired&quot;) ?  It&#039;s not necessarily that interesting or revealing how &quot;surprised&quot; some observer was- that may may (usually will) say more about the observer than the observed.  Unless, of course, the result is shocking in general.

I don&#039;t know what a virtual mouse would experience- but then I don&#039;t know what an actual mouse experiences.

If accurate, I would theorize a virtual human brain would experience what the human brain experiences. Which I suspect isn&#039;t much without eyes, ears, and the rest of the nerve cells that sense and feed the brain. Certainly not self awareness or distinction.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Spontaneously.&#8221;</p>
<p>What exactly started happening spontaneously?  If I get the article- they netoworked a bucket of cpu&#8217;s- where each microprocessor stood in for a neuron and then put power into the net. And something happened which was characterized as spontaneous. What happened?</p>
<p>Not speech or word formation, I know. But did the chips do something they weren&#8217;t programmed to do? And if so- was it something that couldn&#8217;t be characterized as emergent (as defined by Kevin Kelley in &#8220;Wired&#8221;) ?  It&#8217;s not necessarily that interesting or revealing how &#8220;surprised&#8221; some observer was- that may may (usually will) say more about the observer than the observed.  Unless, of course, the result is shocking in general.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what a virtual mouse would experience- but then I don&#8217;t know what an actual mouse experiences.</p>
<p>If accurate, I would theorize a virtual human brain would experience what the human brain experiences. Which I suspect isn&#8217;t much without eyes, ears, and the rest of the nerve cells that sense and feed the brain. Certainly not self awareness or distinction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
