<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Did Pluto Change Color?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/astronomy/why-did-pluto-c.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/astronomy/why-did-pluto-c.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Kornfeld</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/astronomy/why-did-pluto-c.html#comment-5116</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Kornfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 23:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=2055#comment-5116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brown is the one who keeps missing the point of these developments when he repeatedly talks about his fantasy of having &quot;killed&quot; Pluto. As a dynamic world with geology and weather, Pluto shows it has more in common with the other, bigger planets than it does with most Kuiper Belt Objects except the few large ones, which should be considered planets too. Most KBOs in PlutoÂ’s orbital path are tiny and do not have these features. These images show that before making definitive classifications, we should first get the data and analyze it; otherwise, we are defining objects without knowing significant factors about them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brown is the one who keeps missing the point of these developments when he repeatedly talks about his fantasy of having &#8220;killed&#8221; Pluto. As a dynamic world with geology and weather, Pluto shows it has more in common with the other, bigger planets than it does with most Kuiper Belt Objects except the few large ones, which should be considered planets too. Most KBOs in PlutoÂ’s orbital path are tiny and do not have these features. These images show that before making definitive classifications, we should first get the data and analyze it; otherwise, we are defining objects without knowing significant factors about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
