<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the brain too strange to emulate?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html</link>
	<description>Live to see it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2021 08:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Brown</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9399</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ahh, I think I see the problem.  A Turing machine is programmable for independent operation, but not necessarily able to pass the Turing test for independent intelligence.

Discovering whether or not I can pass the test can be left for another occasion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I think I see the problem.  A Turing machine is programmable for independent operation, but not necessarily able to pass the Turing test for independent intelligence.</p>
<p>Discovering whether or not I can pass the test can be left for another occasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9398</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will:

Also, check out this &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/000988.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Speculist post&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will:</p>
<p>Also, check out this <a href="https://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/000988.html" rel="nofollow">Speculist post</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9397</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 05:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will:

&lt;i&gt;Isn&#039;t a Turing machine simply an archaic term for AGI?&lt;/i&gt;

No.  Read &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; about the related concept of &quot;Turing completeness.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will:</p>
<p><i>Isn&#8217;t a Turing machine simply an archaic term for AGI?</i></p>
<p>No.  Read <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_completeness" rel="nofollow">here</a> about the related concept of &#8220;Turing completeness.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Bowermaster</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9396</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Bowermaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 22:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legion --

&lt;i&gt;It&#039;s not correct to assume that brain function is describable by what most computer scientists think of as an &quot;algorithm.&quot;

Allow me to make a response that is just bas logical and evidence-backed as your position:

&quot;Yes it is.&quot;

&lt;i&gt;Not unless you consider the universe itself to be an algorithm.&lt;/i&gt;

Any reason why we shouldn&#039;t? Other than your say-so?&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legion &#8211;</p>
<p><i>It&#8217;s not correct to assume that brain function is describable by what most computer scientists think of as an &#8220;algorithm.&#8221;</p>
<p>Allow me to make a response that is just bas logical and evidence-backed as your position:</p>
<p>&#8220;Yes it is.&#8221;</p>
<p></i><i>Not unless you consider the universe itself to be an algorithm.</i></p>
<p>Any reason why we shouldn&#8217;t? Other than your say-so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Gordon</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9395</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Legion:

Follow the &quot;Linkathon&quot; link and you will learn that this series is where people email us with links.  I can&#039;t provide a link to the email.

Am I certain that biological brains can be simulated in silicon?  Nope.  Did the words &quot;I suspect&quot; not clue you in on that?  This is my opinion.

How many lifetimes of the universe?  Well, let&#039;s give it 100 years.  If it doesn&#039;t happen within that time &quot;I&#039;d suspect&quot; that it probably can&#039;t happen for one reason or another.

See Arthur C. Clarke on the danger of saying something is &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke&#039;s_three_laws&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;impossible&lt;/a&gt;&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legion:</p>
<p>Follow the &#8220;Linkathon&#8221; link and you will learn that this series is where people email us with links.  I can&#8217;t provide a link to the email.</p>
<p>Am I certain that biological brains can be simulated in silicon?  Nope.  Did the words &#8220;I suspect&#8221; not clue you in on that?  This is my opinion.</p>
<p>How many lifetimes of the universe?  Well, let&#8217;s give it 100 years.  If it doesn&#8217;t happen within that time &#8220;I&#8217;d suspect&#8221; that it probably can&#8217;t happen for one reason or another.</p>
<p>See Arthur C. Clarke on the danger of saying something is &#8220;<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clarke's_three_laws" rel="nofollow">impossible</a>&#8220;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Brown</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9394</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m Will Brown; mind your manners, &lt;strong&gt;[well-phrased personal attack removed.]&lt;/strong&gt;

As to your emulation idea Stephen, I think the added levels of complexity inherent to that model works against it.  Any model that says, &quot;First, build a Turing machine ...&quot; sort of misses the point don&#039;t you think?  Isn&#039;t a Turing machine simply an archaic term for AGI?

Learning to emulate specific brain functions will almost certainly be useful to the development process of integrating manufactured enhancement into human brain/mind capability.  I think that process the more likely (if somewhat serendipitous) route to independent AGI then the purely mechanical emulation one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m Will Brown; mind your manners, <strong>[well-phrased personal attack removed.]</strong></p>
<p>As to your emulation idea Stephen, I think the added levels of complexity inherent to that model works against it.  Any model that says, &#8220;First, build a Turing machine &#8230;&#8221; sort of misses the point don&#8217;t you think?  Isn&#8217;t a Turing machine simply an archaic term for AGI?</p>
<p>Learning to emulate specific brain functions will almost certainly be useful to the development process of integrating manufactured enhancement into human brain/mind capability.  I think that process the more likely (if somewhat serendipitous) route to independent AGI then the purely mechanical emulation one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 07:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I mentioned in a previous comment, there are limits to abstraction in the real world.  No one has succeeded in creating an algorithm that describes how the brain does what it does.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I mentioned in a previous comment, there are limits to abstraction in the real world.  No one has succeeded in creating an algorithm that describes how the brain does what it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: legion</title>
		<link>https://blog.speculist.com/artificial_intelligence/is-the-brain-to.html#comment-9392</link>
		<dc:creator>legion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 07:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/specblog/?p=1331#comment-9392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;So even if the brain is not a Turing machine, it could be emulated by a sufficiently powerful Turing machine. In theory.&lt;/i&gt;

Are you certain about that?  How many lifetimes of the universe would it take?  What are your sources?

It&#039;s not correct to assume that brain function is describable by what most computer scientists think of as an &quot;algorithm.&quot;  Not unless you consider the universe itself to be an algorithm.

You mentioned Will Brown, but failed to provide a link.  Please observe proper link etiquette, as people are watching.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>So even if the brain is not a Turing machine, it could be emulated by a sufficiently powerful Turing machine. In theory.</i></p>
<p>Are you certain about that?  How many lifetimes of the universe would it take?  What are your sources?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not correct to assume that brain function is describable by what most computer scientists think of as an &#8220;algorithm.&#8221;  Not unless you consider the universe itself to be an algorithm.</p>
<p>You mentioned Will Brown, but failed to provide a link.  Please observe proper link etiquette, as people are watching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
