The Speculist: A discussion of the film "The Prestige"

logo.jpg

Live to see it.


« Movie Reviews | Main | I, For One, Kind of Like Techno »


A discussion of the film "The Prestige"

Let me get the movie review part out of the way. The Prestige is great! Go see it. 5 out of 5 stars.

What I really want to do is talk about the movie - with spoilers. Trust me - you don't want this movie spoiled. Imagine having The Sixth Sense explained in advance. Come back when you've seen the movie.

[BIG BAD SPOILERS AHEAD]

The Prestige is Science Fiction. Since it's set in the Victorian era, I guess that makes it part of the Steampunk subgenre. But the film hides this. The film's genre' is a key element of the reveal. You have no idea that the film hinges on a sci-fi element until the last act.

It starts off looking like very much like the The Illusionist - another great film that I highly recommend. But The Prestige is deeper, more complex, and ultimately more disturbing and thought provoking. Imagine two card games – Spades and Contract Bridge. Both are great games, both are played with the same deck of cards. But one game asks more of its participants. The Prestige quite literally asks for a greater commitment from the audience:

"Are you watching closely?"

A Contract Bridge player could be forgiven for believing (incorrectly) that the standard deck of cards was created for their game. Every element of the standard deck - the suits, the ranks - is essential and is exploited by that game at a level that other card games can't touch. That's The Prestige. Old sci-fi tropes like the philosophical problem of the transporter in Star Trek (are you actually transported OR are you destroyed and then cloned elsewhere?) are used to better effect here than ever before. Though we know it's not true, this film is such an intricate device that it feels like these elements of fiction were invented to serve this story.

The movie is also a character study of the price of obsession and ambition. Early in the movie Robert Angier's (Hugh Jackman) wife dies apparently because of a mistake made by the film's other magician Alfred Borden (Christian Bale). This death is given, initially, as the reason for the feud that follows between Angier and Borden. But in anger Angier reveals that this is not the case. The feud is all about obsession, envy, and pride.

Some viewers might be turned off by the viciousness of their conflict. There is no clear-cut protagonist or antagonist. Neither magician is morally admirable. Both have sold-out to the obsession that they have in common but can never share - the passion to be the best illusionist in the world.

Ultimately this mad contest drives Robert Angier to seek out a real wizard - Nikola Tesla - the real-world archetype of the "mad scientist." Like Angier and Borden, Tesla has been fighting a similar war with Thomas Edison. But by the time he is introduced, his war is lost. And Tesla knows it. He accepts Angier's challenge to make real magic more for the private satisfaction of beating Edison than for any glory or money.

The problem - Tesla doesn't deliver a transporter. It's a copy machine. One Angier goes in, two Angiers come out. Because there's room for only one Angier, each performance requires a suicide. Or is it murder?

Its interesting that Angier limits himself to 100 performances. Why? Hugh Jackman does a superb job showing that Angier is bothered by what he is doing. How many times would you want to kill a copy of yourself? How many times would you want to take the 50-50 chance of being the one who is killed?

Through a mind-bending twist, Angier sets Borden up as the murderer of one of the dying Angiers. I suppose that if you're willing to kill yourself over and over for your obsession, what's unjustly sending your rival to the gallows compared to that?

When you think there couldn't possibly be another twist, Borden's double life is revealed. You learn how far he went to fulfill his obsession. He also took it to another level.

Fun, disturbing, and thought provoking. This film is a modern classic. It will be enjoyed by the public and studied by film students for years to come.

Comments

I have to agree with this assessment of The Prestige. I am astounded that this movie didn't get widely released in theaters. In fact, I never even heard of it until I saw it on DVD a little while ago - and I'm glad I did. The comparasin to The Sixth Sense is apt; one could also compare it to No Way Out or Fight Club for all the twists and turns in the plot.

The Prestige was an absolutely fantastic movie. There are symbols on several levels and hints all throughout the movie. I saw it once in the theater and it took a good chunk of my wild ruminations over the next couple of days just to think about it. I bought it on DVD and watched it two days in a row. Both times I saw new things.

The symbolism with the birds is profound. Most of the disappearing bird/cage tricks require two birds, one of which is sacrificed for the trick. Apt.

Plus, the opening scene with the top hats--it's right there in plain sight--marvelous.

One thing it took me until the third viewing to realize was that the wife Elizabeth figured out Borden's secret. That's what they were arguing about the night before she killed herself.

The only thing I haven't quite worked out is--OK. So you have this unbelievably accurate copying machine that can duplicate the complexities of all the nano-scale detail of a human at the molecular and cellular level....and you use it to...copy yourself?

Why not copy a huge pile of diamonds? And then copy the two new pile of diamonds, and then those four....

D:

Good point. It could have solved Tesla's money problems too.

Best explanation: both men - Tesla and Angier - were so blinded by their obsessions that they couldn't see the more obvious money-making opportunities for the machine.

The thing that got me wondering, was at the end with the wrap-up. I'm probably looking too deeply into the movie, but as Alfred is leaving with Sara, Cutter looks around. Now, watch the movie, but assume that Cutter is Alfred's twin, but he escapes or fooled the noose.
(Hey, it worked in Romeo&Juliet) Comments?

Post a comment

(Comments are moderated, and sometimes they take a while to appear. Thanks for waiting.)






Be a Speculist

Share your thoughts on the future with more than

70,000

Speculist readers. Write to us at:

speculist1@yahoo.com

(More details here.)



Blogroll



Categories

Powered by
Movable Type 3.2